I.F. et al v. City of Vallejo et al
Filing
46
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/24/2020 SETTING the Settlement Conference before the Honorable Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 7/21/2020 at 10:00 AM. at the San Francisco Courthouse, Courtroom C, located at 450 Golden Gate Ave., San Francisco, California 94102. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
5
MICHAEL J. HADDAD (State Bar No. 189114)
JULIA SHERWIN (State Bar No. 189268)
TERESA ALLEN (State Bar No. 264865)
HADDAD & SHERWIN LLP
505 Seventeenth Street
Oakland, California 94612
Telephone: (510) 452-5500
Facsimile: (510) 452-5510
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff I.F.
2
3
4
7
12
JOHN L. BURRIS, Esq., SBN 69888
ADANTE D. POINTER, Esq., SBN 236229
PATRICK M. BUELNA, Esq., SBN 317043
LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS
Airport Corporate Center
7677 Oakport St., Suite 1120
Oakland, CA 94621
Telephone: (510) 839-5200
Facsimile: (510) 839-3882
13
Attorneys for Plaintiffs R.F., Paula McGowan, and Ronell Foster Sr.
8
9
10
11
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
18
19
20
I.F., by and through her guardian ad litem SHASTA
SKINNER, individually and as successor-in-interest to
Decedent RONELL FOSTER; R.F., by and through his
guardian ad litem SHENA BATTEN, individually and
as successor-in-interest to Decedent RONELL
FOSTER; PAULA MCGOWAN, individually; and
RONELL FOSTER, SR., individually.
21
Plaintiffs,
22
vs.
23
CITY OF VALLEJO, a municipal corporation; RYAN
MCMAHON, individually and in his official capacity as
a Police Officer for the CITY OF VALLEJO; and
DOES 1-50, inclusive.
24
25
26
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No: 2:18-cv-00673-JAM-CKD
STIPULATION AND JOINT
REQUEST FOR SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE WITH
NORTHERN DISTRICT
MAGISTRATE JUDGE
LAUREL BEELER; ORDER
27
28
No: 2:18-cv-00673-JAM-CKD STIPULATION AND JOINT REQUEST FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE WITH
NORTHERN DISTRICT MAGISTRATE JUDGE LAUREL BEELER; (PROPOSED) ORDER
1
1
2
3
TO THE HONORABLE COURT:
By and through their counsel of record in this action, all parties hereby stipulate for the purposes
4
of jointly requesting that the Court grant a transfer of this case to the United States District Court for the
5
Northern District of California for the limited purpose of conducting the settlement conference before
6
the Honorable Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. The settlement conference would take place before
7
Judge Beeler on July 21, 2020 at 10:00 a.m. at the San Francisco Courthouse, Courtroom C, located at
8
450 Golden Gate Ave., San Francisco, California 94102. The parties have contacted Judge Beeler’s
9
10
chambers concerning this matter, and Judge Beeler, who has familiarity with all counsel in this case,
would agree to conduct the settlement conference as requested.
11
All other dates and deadlines from the Court’s Scheduling Orders will not be affected by this
12
13
14
settlement conference.
DATED: April 23, 2020
HADDAD & SHERWIN LLP
/s/ Michael J. Haddad
MICHAEL J. HADDAD
Attorneys for Plaintiff I.F.
15
16
17
18
DATED: April 23, 2020
19
20
ALLEN, GLAESSNER, HAZELWOOD &
WERTH, LLP
__/s/ Dale L. Allen, Jr.__________
DALE L. ALLEN, JR.
Attorneys for Defendant City of Vallejo
21
22
23
DATED: April 23, 2020
LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS
24
25
26
27
/s/ Adante D. Pointer
ADANTE D. POINTER
PATRICK BUELNA
Attorney for Plaintiffs, R.F., et al.
28
No: 2:18-cv-00673-JAM-CKD STIPULATION AND JOINT REQUEST FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE WITH
NORTHERN DISTRICT MAGISTRATE JUDGE LAUREL BEELER; (PROPOSED) ORDER
2
1
2
3
ORDER
Based on the parties’ stipulation, and with good cause appearing therefore,
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
DATED: April 24, 2020
/s/ John A. Mendez
6
7
8
Hon. John A. Mendez
U. S. District Court Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
No: 2:18-cv-00673-JAM-CKD STIPULATION AND JOINT REQUEST FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE WITH
NORTHERN DISTRICT MAGISTRATE JUDGE LAUREL BEELER; (PROPOSED) ORDER
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?