I.F. et al v. City of Vallejo et al

Filing 46

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/24/2020 SETTING the Settlement Conference before the Honorable Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 7/21/2020 at 10:00 AM. at the San Francisco Courthouse, Courtroom C, located at 450 Golden Gate Ave., San Francisco, California 94102. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 5 MICHAEL J. HADDAD (State Bar No. 189114) JULIA SHERWIN (State Bar No. 189268) TERESA ALLEN (State Bar No. 264865) HADDAD & SHERWIN LLP 505 Seventeenth Street Oakland, California 94612 Telephone: (510) 452-5500 Facsimile: (510) 452-5510 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff I.F. 2 3 4 7 12 JOHN L. BURRIS, Esq., SBN 69888 ADANTE D. POINTER, Esq., SBN 236229 PATRICK M. BUELNA, Esq., SBN 317043 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS Airport Corporate Center 7677 Oakport St., Suite 1120 Oakland, CA 94621 Telephone: (510) 839-5200 Facsimile: (510) 839-3882 13 Attorneys for Plaintiffs R.F., Paula McGowan, and Ronell Foster Sr. 8 9 10 11 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 18 19 20 I.F., by and through her guardian ad litem SHASTA SKINNER, individually and as successor-in-interest to Decedent RONELL FOSTER; R.F., by and through his guardian ad litem SHENA BATTEN, individually and as successor-in-interest to Decedent RONELL FOSTER; PAULA MCGOWAN, individually; and RONELL FOSTER, SR., individually. 21 Plaintiffs, 22 vs. 23 CITY OF VALLEJO, a municipal corporation; RYAN MCMAHON, individually and in his official capacity as a Police Officer for the CITY OF VALLEJO; and DOES 1-50, inclusive. 24 25 26 Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No: 2:18-cv-00673-JAM-CKD STIPULATION AND JOINT REQUEST FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE WITH NORTHERN DISTRICT MAGISTRATE JUDGE LAUREL BEELER; ORDER 27 28 No: 2:18-cv-00673-JAM-CKD STIPULATION AND JOINT REQUEST FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE WITH NORTHERN DISTRICT MAGISTRATE JUDGE LAUREL BEELER; (PROPOSED) ORDER 1 1 2 3 TO THE HONORABLE COURT: By and through their counsel of record in this action, all parties hereby stipulate for the purposes 4 of jointly requesting that the Court grant a transfer of this case to the United States District Court for the 5 Northern District of California for the limited purpose of conducting the settlement conference before 6 the Honorable Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. The settlement conference would take place before 7 Judge Beeler on July 21, 2020 at 10:00 a.m. at the San Francisco Courthouse, Courtroom C, located at 8 450 Golden Gate Ave., San Francisco, California 94102. The parties have contacted Judge Beeler’s 9 10 chambers concerning this matter, and Judge Beeler, who has familiarity with all counsel in this case, would agree to conduct the settlement conference as requested. 11 All other dates and deadlines from the Court’s Scheduling Orders will not be affected by this 12 13 14 settlement conference. DATED: April 23, 2020 HADDAD & SHERWIN LLP /s/ Michael J. Haddad MICHAEL J. HADDAD Attorneys for Plaintiff I.F. 15 16 17 18 DATED: April 23, 2020 19 20 ALLEN, GLAESSNER, HAZELWOOD & WERTH, LLP __/s/ Dale L. Allen, Jr.__________ DALE L. ALLEN, JR. Attorneys for Defendant City of Vallejo 21 22 23 DATED: April 23, 2020 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS 24 25 26 27 /s/ Adante D. Pointer ADANTE D. POINTER PATRICK BUELNA Attorney for Plaintiffs, R.F., et al. 28 No: 2:18-cv-00673-JAM-CKD STIPULATION AND JOINT REQUEST FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE WITH NORTHERN DISTRICT MAGISTRATE JUDGE LAUREL BEELER; (PROPOSED) ORDER 2 1 2 3 ORDER Based on the parties’ stipulation, and with good cause appearing therefore, IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 DATED: April 24, 2020 /s/ John A. Mendez 6 7 8 Hon. John A. Mendez U. S. District Court Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 No: 2:18-cv-00673-JAM-CKD STIPULATION AND JOINT REQUEST FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE WITH NORTHERN DISTRICT MAGISTRATE JUDGE LAUREL BEELER; (PROPOSED) ORDER 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?