I.F. et al v. City of Vallejo et al

Filing 65

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 8/4/2020. United States Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler shall exercise jurisdiction over this matter for all purposes concerning settlement, including resolution of the motions to approve minors' compromises, and enforcing any settlement. All dates in this matter will be vacated and a conditional dismissal will be set for 90 days to permit the parties to execute appropriate settlement releases and documents, to permit the court to hear and decide motions to approve the minors' compromises, and for Defendants to issue checks. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 MICHAEL J. HADDAD (State Bar No. 189114) JULIA SHERWIN (State Bar No. 189268) TERESA ALLEN (State Bar No. 264865) HADDAD & SHERWIN LLP 505 Seventeenth Street Oakland, California 94612 Telephone: (510) 452-5500 Facsimile: (510) 452-5510 Attorneys for Plaintiff I.F. 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 I.F., by and through her guardian ad litem SHASTA SKINNER, individually and as successor-in-interest to Decedent RONELL FOSTER; R.F., by and through his guardian ad litem SHENA BATTEN, individually and as successor-in-interest to Decedent RONELL FOSTER; PAULA MCGOWAN, individually; and RONELL FOSTER, SR., individually. 15 Plaintiffs, 16 vs. 17 CITY OF VALLEJO, a municipal corporation; RYAN MCMAHON, individually and in his official capacity as a Police Officer for the CITY OF VALLEJO; and DOES 1-50, inclusive. 18 19 20 Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CAND No: 20-mc-80075-LB CAED No: 2:18-cv-00673-JAM-CKD NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL SETTLEMENT AND STIPULATION BETWEEN PLAINTIFFS AND THE CITY OF VALLEJO, AND ORDER, FOR MAGISTRATE JUDGE LAUREL BEELER’S EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION TO RESOLVE REMAINDER OF CASE 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 2:18-cv-00673-JAM-CKD: NOTICE OF SETTLMENT AND STIP AND (PROPOSED) ORDER FOR MAGISTRATE JURISDICTION 1 [Plaintiffs’ Statement preceeding stipulation]: TO THE COURT AND PARTIES, please take 2 notice that the parties have reached a conditional settlement agreement, discussed below. All Plaintiffs 3 and the City of Vallejo have further stipulated to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler to exercise jurisdiction 4 to resolve the minors’ compromises and enforce the settlement, as set forth below. The City of Vallejo 5 6 and its risk management authority will be paying all settlement funds. Bruce Kilday, counsel for Defendant Ryan McMahon, has not responded to multiple requests to respond to this stipulation. 7 8 9 10 STIPULATION BETWEEN ALL PLAINTIFFS AND DEFENDANT CITY OF VALLEJO The parties participated in a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on July 11 21, 2020, and have continued settlement discussions. The parties have reached an agreement to settle this 12 matter, subject to approval by the California Joint Powers Risk Management Board of Directors. To 13 conserve the time and resources of this Court, the parties hereby consent that Judge Beeler shall exercise 14 jurisdiction to resolve the forthcoming motions to approve minors’ compromises for the minor Plaintiffs, 15 16 and to enforce the settlement, and the parties hereby consent to Magistrate Judge Beeler’s exercise of 17 jurisdiction over this matter for all purposes related to the settlement. If the settlement is not approved, 18 the case will revert back to the jurisdiction of Judge John A. Mendez for remaining proceedings, including 19 trial. Judge Beeler has agreed to accept jurisdiction of this matter for settlement and post-settlement 20 matters, to conserve the time and resources of this Court. The parties request that all dates in this matter 21 be vacated and the Court issue a 90-day conditional dismissal, to permit the parties to execute appropriate 22 settlement releases and documents, to permit Judge Beeler to hear and decide the motions to approve 23 24 25 minor’s compromises, and for Defendants to issue settlement checks. If the matter is not resolved, Judge Beeler shall remand the matter back to the jurisdiction of Judge A. Mendez for further proceedings. 26 27 28 No: 2:18-cv-00673-JAM-CKD: NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND STIP AND (PROPOSED) ORDER FOR MAGISTRATE JURISDICTION 1 1 DATED: July 30, 2020 2 HADDAD & SHERWIN LLP /s/ Julia Sherwin JULIA SHERWIN Attorneys for Plaintiff I.F. 3 4 5 DATED: July 30, 2020 LAW OFFICE OF JOHN L. BURRIS 6 __/s/ John L. Burris_______________ JOHN L. BURRIS Attorney for Plaintiffs, R.F., PAULA MCGOWAN, and RONELL FOSTER, SR. 7 8 9 . 10 11 DATED: July 30, 2020 POINTER & BUELNA LLP 12 __/s/ Adante D. Pointer__ _________ ADANTE D. POINTER PATRICK BUELNA Attorney for Plaintiffs, R.F., PAULA MCGOWAN, and RONELL FOSTER, SR. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 DATED: August 3, 2020 ALLEN, GLAESSNER, HAZELWOOD, WERTH /s/ Dale L. Allen, Jr.______________ DALE L. ALLEN, JR. JOHN ROBINSON Attorneys for Defendants City of Vallejo 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 No: 2:18-cv-00673-JAM-CKD: NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND STIP AND (PROPOSED) ORDER FOR MAGISTRATE JURISDICTION 2 1 2 ORDER Based on the Plaintiffs’ and City of Vallejo’s stipulation, and with good cause appearing therefore, 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. United States Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler shall exercise jurisdiction over this 4 5 matter for all purposes concerning settlement, including resolution of the motions to approve minors’ 6 compromises, and enforcing any settlement. All dates in this matter will be vacated and a conditional 7 dismissal will be set for 90 days to permit the parties to execute appropriate settlement releases and 8 documents, to permit the court to hear and decide motions to approve the minors’ compromises, and for 9 Defendants to issue checks. 10 11 DATED: August 4, 2020 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ 12 13 HON. JOHN A. MENDEZ United States District Court Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 No: 2:18-cv-00673-JAM-CKD: NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND STIP AND (PROPOSED) ORDER FOR MAGISTRATE JURISDICTION 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?