I.F. et al v. City of Vallejo et al
Filing
65
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 8/4/2020. United States Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler shall exercise jurisdiction over this matter for all purposes concerning settlement, including resolution of the motions to approve minors' compromises, and enforcing any settlement. All dates in this matter will be vacated and a conditional dismissal will be set for 90 days to permit the parties to execute appropriate settlement releases and documents, to permit the court to hear and decide motions to approve the minors' compromises, and for Defendants to issue checks. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
MICHAEL J. HADDAD (State Bar No. 189114)
JULIA SHERWIN (State Bar No. 189268)
TERESA ALLEN (State Bar No. 264865)
HADDAD & SHERWIN LLP
505 Seventeenth Street
Oakland, California 94612
Telephone: (510) 452-5500
Facsimile: (510) 452-5510
Attorneys for Plaintiff I.F.
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
13
14
I.F., by and through her guardian ad litem
SHASTA SKINNER, individually and as
successor-in-interest to Decedent
RONELL FOSTER; R.F., by and through
his guardian ad litem SHENA BATTEN,
individually and as successor-in-interest to
Decedent RONELL FOSTER; PAULA
MCGOWAN, individually; and RONELL
FOSTER, SR., individually.
15
Plaintiffs,
16
vs.
17
CITY OF VALLEJO, a municipal
corporation; RYAN MCMAHON,
individually and in his official capacity as
a Police Officer for the CITY OF
VALLEJO; and DOES 1-50, inclusive.
18
19
20
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CAND No: 20-mc-80075-LB
CAED No: 2:18-cv-00673-JAM-CKD
NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL
SETTLEMENT AND STIPULATION
BETWEEN PLAINTIFFS AND THE
CITY OF VALLEJO, AND ORDER,
FOR MAGISTRATE JUDGE LAUREL
BEELER’S EXERCISE OF
JURISDICTION TO RESOLVE
REMAINDER OF CASE
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 2:18-cv-00673-JAM-CKD: NOTICE OF SETTLMENT AND STIP AND (PROPOSED) ORDER FOR MAGISTRATE
JURISDICTION
1
[Plaintiffs’ Statement preceeding stipulation]: TO THE COURT AND PARTIES, please take
2
notice that the parties have reached a conditional settlement agreement, discussed below. All Plaintiffs
3
and the City of Vallejo have further stipulated to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler to exercise jurisdiction
4
to resolve the minors’ compromises and enforce the settlement, as set forth below. The City of Vallejo
5
6
and its risk management authority will be paying all settlement funds. Bruce Kilday, counsel for
Defendant Ryan McMahon, has not responded to multiple requests to respond to this stipulation.
7
8
9
10
STIPULATION BETWEEN ALL PLAINTIFFS AND DEFENDANT CITY OF VALLEJO
The parties participated in a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on July
11
21, 2020, and have continued settlement discussions. The parties have reached an agreement to settle this
12
matter, subject to approval by the California Joint Powers Risk Management Board of Directors. To
13
conserve the time and resources of this Court, the parties hereby consent that Judge Beeler shall exercise
14
jurisdiction to resolve the forthcoming motions to approve minors’ compromises for the minor Plaintiffs,
15
16
and to enforce the settlement, and the parties hereby consent to Magistrate Judge Beeler’s exercise of
17
jurisdiction over this matter for all purposes related to the settlement. If the settlement is not approved,
18
the case will revert back to the jurisdiction of Judge John A. Mendez for remaining proceedings, including
19
trial. Judge Beeler has agreed to accept jurisdiction of this matter for settlement and post-settlement
20
matters, to conserve the time and resources of this Court. The parties request that all dates in this matter
21
be vacated and the Court issue a 90-day conditional dismissal, to permit the parties to execute appropriate
22
settlement releases and documents, to permit Judge Beeler to hear and decide the motions to approve
23
24
25
minor’s compromises, and for Defendants to issue settlement checks. If the matter is not resolved, Judge
Beeler shall remand the matter back to the jurisdiction of Judge A. Mendez for further proceedings.
26
27
28
No: 2:18-cv-00673-JAM-CKD: NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND STIP AND (PROPOSED) ORDER FOR MAGISTRATE
JURISDICTION
1
1
DATED: July 30, 2020
2
HADDAD & SHERWIN LLP
/s/ Julia Sherwin
JULIA SHERWIN
Attorneys for Plaintiff I.F.
3
4
5
DATED: July 30, 2020
LAW OFFICE OF JOHN L. BURRIS
6
__/s/ John L. Burris_______________
JOHN L. BURRIS
Attorney for Plaintiffs, R.F.,
PAULA MCGOWAN,
and RONELL FOSTER, SR.
7
8
9
.
10
11
DATED: July 30, 2020
POINTER & BUELNA LLP
12
__/s/ Adante D. Pointer__ _________
ADANTE D. POINTER
PATRICK BUELNA
Attorney for Plaintiffs, R.F.,
PAULA MCGOWAN,
and RONELL FOSTER, SR.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
DATED: August 3, 2020
ALLEN, GLAESSNER, HAZELWOOD, WERTH
/s/ Dale L. Allen, Jr.______________
DALE L. ALLEN, JR.
JOHN ROBINSON
Attorneys for Defendants City of Vallejo
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
No: 2:18-cv-00673-JAM-CKD: NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND STIP AND (PROPOSED) ORDER FOR MAGISTRATE
JURISDICTION
2
1
2
ORDER
Based on the Plaintiffs’ and City of Vallejo’s stipulation, and with good cause appearing therefore,
3
IT IS SO ORDERED. United States Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler shall exercise jurisdiction over this
4
5
matter for all purposes concerning settlement, including resolution of the motions to approve minors’
6
compromises, and enforcing any settlement. All dates in this matter will be vacated and a conditional
7
dismissal will be set for 90 days to permit the parties to execute appropriate settlement releases and
8
documents, to permit the court to hear and decide motions to approve the minors’ compromises, and for
9
Defendants to issue checks.
10
11
DATED: August 4, 2020
/s/ John A. Mendez____________
12
13
HON. JOHN A. MENDEZ
United States District Court Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
No: 2:18-cv-00673-JAM-CKD: NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND STIP AND (PROPOSED) ORDER FOR MAGISTRATE
JURISDICTION
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?