Pickern v. Rasher et al

Filing 17

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/14/18 DISMISSING this action without prejudice. The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Stipulated Judgment under the authority of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 511 U.S. 375, 381-82 (1994). CASE CLOSED. (Coll, A)

1
2
3
4
5

DAVID E. KARLIN (S.B.N 275905)
THE KARLIN LAW FIRM LLP
13522 Newport Ave, Suite 201
Tustin CA 92780
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email:
[e-mail]
Attorney for Defendants

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH (S.B.N. 074414)
THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH,
A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION
1165 Hoff Way, #203
Chico, CA 95963
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Email:
[e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiff
BRENDA PICKERN

14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

) CASE NO. 2:18-cv-00678-TLN-CMK
)
)
Plaintiff,
) STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND
) ORDER THEREON
v.
)
)
TACO TIJUANA; CHARLES RASHER; )
)
DAVID MAX SCRUBY and VICKIE LEE )
SCRUBY, TRUSTEES of THE DAVID )
AND VICKIE SCRUBY REVOCABLE )
)
TRUST, established February 27, 2004;
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
BRENDA PICKERN

26
27
28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND ORDER

1
2

The Parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to dismissal
of this action in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(2).

3

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between parties to this action

4

through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action become and

5

hereby is dismissed with prejudice and each side is to bear its own costs and

6

attorneys’ fees.

7

The parties further consent to and request that the Court retain

8

jurisdiction over enforcement of the Agreement. See Kokkonen v. Guardian

9

Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375 (1994) (empowering the district courts to retain

10

jurisdiction over enforcement of settlement agreements).

11

Respectfully Submitted,

12
13

Dated: November 13, 2018

14
15

By: /s/ Thomas E. Frankovich
Thomas E. Frankovich
Attorney for Plaintiff

16
17
18
19
20

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH, APLC
A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

Dated: November 13, 2018

KARLIN LAW FIRM, LLP
By: /s/ David E. Karlin
David E. Karlin
Attorney for Defendants

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND ORDER

1
2

I, David E. Karlin attest that all other signatories listed, and on whose behalf the
filing is submitted, concur in the filing’s content and have authorized the filing

3
4
5

__/s/ David E. Karlin________
David E. Karlin

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND ORDER

1

ORDER

2
3
4
5

The parties having so stipulated,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed without
prejudice. The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the

6
7
8

Stipulated Judgment under the authority of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co.
of America, 511 U.S. 375, 381-82 (1994).

9
10

IT IS SO ORDERED.

11
12

Dated: November 14, 2018

13
14
15
16

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND ORDER