Uribe v. Shinnette et al

Filing 32

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 11/27/2018 GRANTING 31 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff is granted 60 days from the date of this order in which to file an opposition. (Huang, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOEL URIBE, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:18-cv-0689 JAM DB P v. ORDER E. SHINNETTE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to file an opposition to defendants’ motion for 17 18 summary judgment. Plaintiff states that the prison is on lockdown and he is unable to access the 19 law library. The court finds plaintiff has established good cause for an extension of time. 20 However, plaintiff has not shown that he requires 90 days to complete his opposition. The court 21 finds good cause for a 60-day extension of time. 22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 23 1. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 31) is granted; and 24 //// 25 //// 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// 1 2 3 2. Plaintiff is granted 60 days from the date of this order in which to file an opposition. Any reply shall be filed and served in accordance with Local Rule 230(l). Dated: November 27, 2018 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 DLB:9 DB/prisoner-civil rights/urib0689.36opp 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?