Uribe v. Shinnette et al
Filing
32
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 11/27/2018 GRANTING 31 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff is granted 60 days from the date of this order in which to file an opposition. (Huang, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOEL URIBE,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:18-cv-0689 JAM DB P
v.
ORDER
E. SHINNETTE, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to file an opposition to defendants’ motion for
17
18
summary judgment. Plaintiff states that the prison is on lockdown and he is unable to access the
19
law library. The court finds plaintiff has established good cause for an extension of time.
20
However, plaintiff has not shown that he requires 90 days to complete his opposition. The court
21
finds good cause for a 60-day extension of time.
22
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
23
1. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 31) is granted; and
24
////
25
////
26
////
27
////
28
////
1
2
3
2. Plaintiff is granted 60 days from the date of this order in which to file an opposition.
Any reply shall be filed and served in accordance with Local Rule 230(l).
Dated: November 27, 2018
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
DLB:9
DB/prisoner-civil rights/urib0689.36opp
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?