Meador v. Brown et al

Filing 27

ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/18/18 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS issued 5/31/18 18 , are ADOPTED in full; Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction 6 is DENIED; This case is referred back to the assigned Magistrate Judge for all further pretrial proceedings. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GORDON DALE MEADOR, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:18-cv-0696 KJM AC P v. ORDER JERRY BROWN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 17 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided 19 by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 31, 2018, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, which were 20 21 served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and 22 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 18. Plaintiff has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 20. 24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 25 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the file, the court 26 finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations issued May 31, 2018 (ECF No. 18), are 3 ADOPTED in full, 4 2. Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction (ECF No. 6) is DENIED, 5 3. This case if referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial 6 proceedings. 7 DATED: September 18, 2018. 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?