Anderson et al v. Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P. et al

Filing 27

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 11/13/18 GRANTING 25 Ex Parte Application for an Order Extending Page Limits. Defendants and Plaintiffs are GRANTED permission to file memoranda of law related to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint that exceed the page limits prescribed by the Court's 3 Order Re Filing Requirements as follows: Defendants' memorandum of law in support of their Motion not to exceed 20 pages; Plaintiffs' memorandum of law in opposition to Defendants' Motion not to exceed 20; and Defendants' reply memorandum of law in support of their Motion not to exceed 10 pages. (Coll, A)

MERYL L. YOUNG, SBN 110156
[e-mail]
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
3161 Michelson Drive
Irvine, CA 92612-4412
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 949.451.4220

SAMUEL A. KEESAL, SBN 38014
[e-mail]
KEESAL, YOUNG & LOGAN
400 Oceangate
Long Beach, CA 90802
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 562.436.7416

8

ALEXANDER K. MIRCHEFF, SBN 245074
[e-mail]
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
333 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 213.229.7520

JULIE L. TAYLOR, SBN 154341
[e-mail]
KEESAL, YOUNG & LOGAN
450 Pacific Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94133
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.981.0136

9

Counsel for Defendants

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13

IN RE EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P.
SECURITIES LITIGATION

CASE NO. 18-cv-00714-JAM-AC
ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED EX
PARTE APPLICATION OF DEFENDANTS
FOR AN ORDER EXTENDING PAGE
LIMITS FOR MEMORANDA OF LAW IN
CONNECTION WITH MOTION TO
DISMISS

14
15
16
17
18

19

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP

[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING PAGE LIMITS
CASE NO. 18-CV-00714-JAM-AC

1

Having reviewed the Unopposed Ex Parte Application of Defendants for an Order Extending

2

Page Limits for Memoranda of Law in Connection with Motion to Dismiss, and good cause having

3

been shown, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendants and Plaintiffs permission to file memoranda of

4

law related to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint (“Motion”) that exceed

5

the page limits prescribed by the Court’s Order Re Filing Requirements dated April 2, 2018 (Dkt. 3-

6

2) as follows:

7

-

Defendants’ memorandum of law in support of their Motion not to exceed 20 pages;

8

-

Plaintiffs’ memorandum of law in opposition to Defendants’ Motion not to exceed 20
pages; and

9
10

-

Defendants’ reply memorandum of law in support of their Motion not to exceed 10 pages.

11
12

IT IS SO ORDERED.

13
14

Dated: 11/13/2018

15
16
17

/s/ John A. Mendez_____________
Hon. John A. Mendez
United States District Court Judge

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP

2

[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING PAGE LIMITS
CASE NO. 18-CV-00714-JAM-AC

PROOF OF SERVICE

1

I, Sandra M. Pineda, declare as follows:

2
3
4

I am employed in the County of Orange, State of California, I am over the age of eighteen
years and am not a party to this action; my business address is 3161 Michelson Dr., Irvine, California
92612-4412, in said County and State. On November 9, 2018, I served the following document(s):
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED EX PARTE APPLICATION
OF DEFENDANTS FOR AN ORDER EXTENDING PAGE LIMITS FOR
MEMORANDA OF LAW IN CONNECTION WITH MOTION TO DISMISS

5
6
7

on the parties stated below, by the following means of service:

8

Ivy T. Ngo
FRANKLIN D. AZAR & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
14426 East Evans Avenue
Aurora, CO 80014
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]

9
10
11

John Garner
GARNER LAW OFFICE
109 North Marshall Avenue
P.O. Box 908
Willows, CA 95988
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]

12
13
14
15
16

Counsel for Plaintiffs
17
18



BY ELECTRONIC TRANSFER TO THE CM/ECF SYSTEM: On this date, I electronically uploaded a true
and correct copy in Adobe “pdf” format the above-listed document(s) to the United States District Court’s Case
Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system. After the electronic filing of a document, service is
deemed complete upon receipt of the Notice of Electronic Filing (“NEF”) by the registered CM/ECF users.



(FEDERAL)

19
20

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

21
22

Executed on November 9, 2018.
Sandra M. Pineda

23
24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP

3

PROOF OF SERVICE
CASE NO. 18-CV-00714-JAM-AC