USA v. State of California et al
Filing
14
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 07/12/18 ORDERING that the 08/13/18 Status Conference is VACATED and setting the following briefing schedule and hearing date for cross-motions for summary judgment: U.S.' Motion for Summary Judgment: 08/13/18; Defendants' Opposition/Cross-Motion: 09/04/18; U.S. Opposition/Reply: 09/24/18; Defendants' Reply: 10/01/18; Hearing: 10/15/18. (Benson, A.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
JEFFREY H. WOOD
Acting Assistant Attorney General
ERIC GRANT (CA Bar No. 151064)
Deputy Assistant Attorney General
JUSTIN HEMINGER (DC Bar. No. 974809)
STACY STOLLER (DC Bar No. 475035)
PETER J. McVEIGH (VA Bar No. 73211)
(202) 514-4642
peter.mcveigh@usdoj.gov
Attorneys
Environment and Natural Resources Division
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W., Room 2630
Washington, D.C. 20530
8
12
McGREGOR W. SCOTT
United States Attorney
DAVID T. SHELLEDY
Civil Chief, Assistant United States Attorney
501 I Street, Suite 10-100
Sacramento, California 95814
(916) 554-2700
david.shelledy@usdoj.gov
13
Counsel for Plaintiff United States of America
9
10
11
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
18
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
19
20
21
22
Plaintiff,
v.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA; and
CALIFORNIA STATE LANDS
COMMISSION, an agency of
the State of California,
23
Defendants.
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation and Proposed Order
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 2:18-cv-721-WBS-DB
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND
HEARING DATE FOR CROSS-MOTIONS
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND
VACATING STATUS CONFERENCE
Page 1
1
In accordance with the agreed scheduling proposal outlined in the Joint Status Report and
2
Discovery Plan filed concurrently herewith, Plaintiff United States of America and Defendants
3
State of California and California State Lands Commission (collectively, “the Parties”) hereby
4
stipulate to a briefing schedule and hearing date pursuant to Local Rule 143. As explained in the
5
Joint Status Report and Discovery Plan, the Parties believe that this case can and should be
6
decided on cross-motions for summary judgment, that no trial will be needed, and that discovery
7
and motion practice should be expedited to avoid the need for a motion for preliminary
8
injunction.
9
10
Accordingly, the Parties further stipulate pursuant to Local Rule 143 to the following briefing
schedule and hearing date for cross-motions for summary judgment:
11
-
United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment: August 13, 2018
12
-
Defendants’ Memorandum in Opposition/Cross-Motion: September 4, 2018
13
-
United States’ Memorandum in Opposition/Reply Memorandum: September 24, 2018
14
-
Defendants’ Reply Memorandum: October 1, 2018
15
-
Hearing Date: October 15, 2018
16
In addition, the parties stipulate that the status conference set for August 13, 2018, by the Court’s
17
order of April 2, 2018 [Doc. 3], is vacated
18
Dated: July 12, 2018.
19
Respectfully submitted,
20
/s/ Peter J. McVeigh
JEFFREY H. WOOD
Acting Assistant Attorney General
ERIC GRANT
Deputy Assistant Attorney General
JUSTIN HEMINGER
STACY STOLLER
PETER J. McVEIGH
Attorneys
Environment and Natural Resources Division
U.S. Department of Justice
21
22
23
24
25
26
McGREGOR W. SCOTT
United States Attorney
DAVID T. SHELLEDY
Civil Chief, Assistant United States Attorney
27
28
Counsel for Plaintiff United States of America
Stipulation and Proposed Order
Page 2
1
2
Dated: July 12, 2018
3
4
5
6
/s/ John Killeen (as authorized on July 12, 2018)
XAVIER BECERRA
Attorney General of California
JAMEE JORDAN PATTERSON
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
BENJAMIN M. GLICKMAN
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
ANDREW M. VOGEL
Deputy Attorney General
7
JOHN W. KILLEEN
Deputy Attorney General
Attorneys
for
the
8
State
Defendants
9
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
Dated: July 12, 2018
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation and Proposed Order
Page 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?