King v. Indy Mac Bank FSB et al

Filing 4

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/27/2020 RECOMMENDING that this action be Dismissed. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Coll, A)

Download PDF
Case 2:18-cv-00727-JAM-EFB Document 4 Filed 08/27/20 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KEVIN KING, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:18-cv-727-JAM-EFB PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS INDY MAC BANK FSB, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action without counsel. On November 6, 2019, the postal 18 service returned documents directed to plaintiff as “Undeliverable, Moved-Left No Address.” A 19 party appearing without counsel must keep the court and all parties apprised of her current 20 address. E.D. Cal. L.R. 183(b). If mail directed to a plaintiff is returned by the postal service and 21 plaintiff fails to notify the court and opposing parties within 63 days thereafter of his current 22 address, the court may dismiss the action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Id. More 23 than 63 days have passed since the postal service returned the mail and plaintiff has not notified 24 the court of his current address. 25 26 Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. L.R. 110, 183(b). 27 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 28 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 1 Case 2:18-cv-00727-JAM-EFB Document 4 Filed 08/27/20 Page 2 of 2 1 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 2 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 3 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections 4 within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. 5 Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 6 Dated: August 27, 2020. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?