King v. Indy Mac Bank FSB et al

Filing 5

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 9/28/2020 ADOPTING 4 Findings and Recommendations in full. This action is DISMISSED. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

KEVIN KING,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:18-cv-727-JAM-EFB PS

v.

ORDER

INDY MAC BANK FSB, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
On August 27, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

17
18

which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings

19

and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.1
Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v. United

20
21

States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are

22

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified Sch. Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).
The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,

23
24

concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.

25

/////

26
27
28

1

Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the findings and
recommendations was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to
keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service
of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective.
1

1
2

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

3

1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed August 27, 2020, are ADOPTED;

4
5

and
2. This action is dismissed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. L.R. 110, 183(b).

6
7
8

DATED: September 28, 2020

/s/ John A. Mendez
HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2