Williams v. Just et al

Filing 18

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 12/6/18 DENYING 17 Request for service of process. (Coll, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LANCE WILLIAMS, 12 No. 2:18-CV-0740-DMC-P Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 D. JUST, et al., 15 ORDER Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 17 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s fifth request for an order directing 19 service of process by the United States Marshal (Doc. 17). As explained in the court’s prior orders (Docs. 9, 12, and 16), the court cannot 20 21 direct service by the United States Marshal because plaintiff has neither sought nor been granted 22 in forma pauperis status, which would permit service of process by the United States Marshal 23 without payments of the costs therefor.1 For this reason, plaintiff’s renewed request for service 24 by the United States Marshal will be denied and plaintiff is required to effect service of process. 25 Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to effect service of process within the time provided in the 26 court’s November 2, 2018, order may result in dismissal of the entire action. See Local Rule 110. 27 Rather than seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis, plaintiff paid the filing fees in full on July 2, 2018. 1 1 28 1 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s fifth request for service of process by the United States Marshal (Doc. 17) is denied. 3 4 5 Dated: December 6, 2018 ____________________________________ DENNIS M. COTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?