Williams v. Just et al
Filing
18
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 12/6/18 DENYING 17 Request for service of process. (Coll, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LANCE WILLIAMS,
12
No. 2:18-CV-0740-DMC-P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
D. JUST, et al.,
15
ORDER
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to
17
18
42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s fifth request for an order directing
19
service of process by the United States Marshal (Doc. 17).
As explained in the court’s prior orders (Docs. 9, 12, and 16), the court cannot
20
21
direct service by the United States Marshal because plaintiff has neither sought nor been granted
22
in forma pauperis status, which would permit service of process by the United States Marshal
23
without payments of the costs therefor.1 For this reason, plaintiff’s renewed request for service
24
by the United States Marshal will be denied and plaintiff is required to effect service of process.
25
Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to effect service of process within the time provided in the
26
court’s November 2, 2018, order may result in dismissal of the entire action. See Local Rule 110.
27
Rather than seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis, plaintiff paid the filing
fees in full on July 2, 2018.
1
1
28
1
2
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s fifth request for service
of process by the United States Marshal (Doc. 17) is denied.
3
4
5
Dated: December 6, 2018
____________________________________
DENNIS M. COTA
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?