USA v. Real Property located at 6920 Kilconnell Drive, Elk Grove, California, Sacramento County, APN: 116-1410-006-0000 et al
Filing
61
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/23/2019 APPROVING the stipulation. Claimant's claim filed on 6/4/2018 and answer filed on 6/25/2018 as to the Defendant Property are hereby deemed WITHDRAWN. Claimant FJM Private Mortgage Fund, LLC is hereby DISMISSED from this action with prejudice. (Zignago, K.)
1 Thomas P. Mazzucco - 139758
TMazzucco@mpbf.com
2 Patrick J. Wingfield - 265140
PWingfield@mpbf.com
3 MURPHY, PEARSON, BRADLEY & FEENEY
88 Kearny Street, 10th Floor
4 San Francisco, CA 94108-5530
Telephone:
(415) 788-1900
5 Facsimile:
(415) 393-8087
6 Attorneys for Claimant
FJM PRIVATE MORTGAGE FUND, LLC
7
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12 UNITED STATES,
Case No.: 2:18-cv-00750-KJM-CKD
13
STIPULATION AND WITHDRAWAL
OF VERIFIED CLAIM AND ANSWER
OF NON-PARTY FJM PRIVATE
MORTGAGE FUND, LLC TO VERIFIED
COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE IN
REM
Plaintiff,
14 v.
15 REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6920
KILCONNELL DRIVE, ELK GROVE,
16 CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO COUNTY,
APN: 116-1410-006-0000,
17
REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9297 FIFE
18 RANCH WAY, ELK GROVE, CALIFORNIA,
SACRAMENTO COUNTY, APN: 127-099019 028-0000,
Action Filed: April 3, 2018
Assigned To: Hon. Kimberly J. Mueller
Referred To: Hon. Carolyn K. Delaney
Trial Date: None Set
20 REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9717
SUTTON POINTE COURT, ELK GROVE,
21 CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO COUNTY,
APN: 132-1110-062-0000,
22
REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9913
23 JASPER COURT, ELK GROVE,
CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO COUNTY,
24 APN: 122-0690-082-0000,
25 REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4305 SAN
MARINO COURT, ELK GROVE,
26 CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO COUNTY,
APN: 119-1980-056-0000,
27
REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8771
28 DILLARD ROAD, WILTON, CALIFORNIA,
-1STIPULATION AND WITHDRAWAL OF VERIFIED CLAIM AND ANSWER OF NON-PARTY FJM
PRIVATE MORTGAGE FUND, LLC
Case No.:
2:18-cv-00750-KJM-CKD
1 SACRAMENTO COUNTY, APN: 126-0390002-0000,
2
REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4871
3 WATSEKA WAY, SACRAMENTO,
CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO COUNTY,
4 APN: 225-1790-028-0000,
5
Defendants.
6
7
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the United States, and FJM PRIVATE MORTGAGE
8 FUND, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY (“Claimant”) as follows:
9
1.
The defendant property subject to this stipulation is as follows (“Defendant Property”):
10 Real property located at 9717 Sutton Pointe Court, Elk Grove, California 95757, APN: 132-1110-06211 0000, including all appurtenances and improvements thereto.
12
2.
On April 3, 2018, the United States of America filed a Verified Complaint for Forfeiture
13 In Rem [Docket No. 1] (“Complaint”) alleging that the Defendant Property, including any right, title and
14 interest in the whole of any lot or tract of land and any appurtenances or improvements thereon, and
15 proceeds traceable thereof, is subject to forfeiture to the United States pursuant to: (a) 18 U.S.C. §
16 981(a)(1)(A); (b) 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C); (c) 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6); and (d) 21 U.S.C. § 881 (a)(7)
17 because it was used and intended to be used to commit or facilitate a violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 et.
18 seq. and/or were involved in a financial transaction in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(1)(B)(I).
19
3.
At the time the Complaint was filed, the record owner of the Defendant Property was
20 MEINA ZHENG (“ZHENG”).
21
4.
On June 4, 2018, Claimant filed a claim in this action alleging a lienholder interest in the
22 Defendant Property [Docket No. 10].
23
5.
On June 25, 2018, Claimant filed an Answer in this action [Docket No. 16].
24
6.
On or about December 2018, the Defendant Property was sold.
25
7.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, Claimant hereby withdraws its claim and Answer filed in
26 the above-captioned case with respect to the Defendant Property.
27
8.
To the extent required under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a), the United
28 States of America agrees to dismiss with prejudice Claimant in the above-captioned case pursuant to the
-2STIPULATION AND WITHDRAWAL OF VERIFIED CLAIM AND ANSWER OF NON-PARTY FJM
PRIVATE MORTGAGE FUND, LLC
Case No.:
2:18-cv-00750-KJM-CKD
1 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a). Defendant Property is the in rem defendant.
2
9.
Claimant is hereby removed from the Service List for the above captioned case.
3
10.
Each party hereto is to bear his, her, and its own costs.
4
5 Dated: September 17, 2019
MURPHY, PEARSON, BRADLEY & FEENEY
6
7
By /s/ Patrick J. Wingfield
Thomas P. Mazzucco
Patrick J. Wingfield
Kavin A. Williams
Attorneys for Claimant
FJM PRIVATE MORTGAGE FUND, LLC
8
9
10
11
12 Dated: September 17, 2019
MCGREGOR W. SCOTT
United States Attorney
13
14
By:
15
/s/ Kevin C. Khasigian__________________
KEVIN C. KHASIGIAN
Assistant United States Attorney
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3STIPULATION AND WITHDRAWAL OF VERIFIED CLAIM AND ANSWER OF NON-PARTY FJM
PRIVATE MORTGAGE FUND, LLC
Case No.:
2:18-cv-00750-KJM-CKD
1
ORDER
2
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that:
3
1.
The Stipulation is hereby APPROVED.
4
2.
Claimant’s claim filed in the above-captioned case on June 4, 2018 and answer filed on
5 June 25, 2018 as to the Defendant Property are hereby deemed withdrawn.
6
3.
Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a), Claimant FJM PRIVATE MORTGAGE FUND, LLC, A
7 CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY is hereby dismissed from this action with prejudice.
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9 Dated: September 23, 2019.
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND WITHDRAWAL OF VERIFIED CLAIM AND ANSWER OF NON-PARTY FJM
PRIVATE MORTGAGE FUND, LLC
Case No.:
2:18-cv-00750-KJM-CKD
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND WITHDRAWAL OF VERIFIED CLAIM AND ANSWER OF NON-PARTY FJM
PRIVATE MORTGAGE FUND, LLC
Case No.:
2:18-cv-00750-KJM-CKD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?