Humes v. Sacramento County Superior Court

Filing 10

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/1/2018 DENYING 9 Motion for Court's Assistance, as framed but construed as a further request for extended time. Plaintiff granted 30 days from the filing date of this order to submit a completed application to proceed IFP in this case. (Henshaw, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JON HUMES, 12 13 14 15 16 No. 2:18-cv-0769 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, Defendant. 17 18 Plaintiff is a Sacramento County Jail inmate proceeding pro se in this action filed pursuant 19 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order filed May 9, 2018, the court granted plaintiff’s request for 20 extended time to submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis, with a deadline of June 7, 21 2018. See ECF No. 6. Plaintiff has now filed a “motion” in this case, and in ten additional cases 22 plaintiff has pending in this court. The “motion” requests this court’s active cooperation in the 23 jail’s processing of plaintiff’s numerous in forma pauperis applications. Plaintiff asks the court to 24 “make 10 copies” of a form application he has completed and attached; to send the copies to 25 Lieutenant Ramos at the jail; and adds that “it would be great if you could put the above case 26 numbers on them too.” See ECF No. 9. 27 Plaintiff’s motion will be denied as frivolous. There is no basis in law or in the rules of 28 the court for the assistance that plaintiff seeks. However, the court will construe the motion as 1 plaintiff’s request for additional time to submit a completed application to proceed in forma 2 pauperis in this case only. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. Plaintiff’s “motion” for the court’s assistance, ECF No. 9, is denied as framed but 5 6 7 8 9 construed as a further request for extended time. 2. Plaintiff is granted thirty (30) days from the filing date of this order in which to submit a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis in this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: June 1, 2018 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?