USA v. Real Property located at 2033 Bastona Drive, Elk Grove, California, Sacramento County, APN: 119-1860-037-0000 et al

Filing 35

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/22/19 GRANTING the 34 Stipulation for Withdrawal of Verified Claim of Lienholders James Bennett Keegan, Jr. and Diane Elaine Keegan, Trustees of the Keegan Family Trust Dated 9/4/1997; WITHDRAWING Claimants Verified Claim filed 5/30/18 7 ; and DISMISSING Claimants from the above-captioned case. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 CLAYTON E. CLEMENT State Bar No. 42751 DAVIN R. BACHO State Bar No. 282613 CLEMENT, FITZPATRICK & KENWORTHY 3333 Mendocino Avenue, Suite 200 Santa Rosa, California 95403 Telephone: (707) 523-1181 Facsimile: (707) 546-1360 Email: cclement@cfk.com jlyons@cfk.com Attorneys for Claimants James Bennett Keegan Jr. and Diane Elaine Keegan, Trustees of the Keegan Family Trust Dated 9/4/1997 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 16 17 Case No. 2:18-cv-00799-KJM-CKD v. REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2033 BASTONA DRIVE, ELK GROVE, CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO COUNTY, APN: 119-1860-037-000, INCLUDING ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THERETO, et al. STIPULATION AND ORDER TO WITHDRAW VERIFIED CLAIM OF LIENHOLDERS, JAMES BENNETT KEEGAN JR. AND DIANE ELAINE KEEGAN, TRUSTEES Defendants. 18 19 20 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between claimants James Bennett Keegan, Jr. 21 and Diane Elaine Keegan, Trustees of the Keegan Family Trust Dated 9/4/1997 (“Claimants”), by 22 and through their counsel, and Plaintiff, the United States of America (“Plaintiff”), by and through 23 its undersigned counsel, Kevin C. Khasigian, Assistant U.S. Attorney, as follows: 24 1. Claimants asserted a lienholder interest in the defendant property located at 25 5759 Muskingham Way, Sacramento, CA 95823; APN: 117-1280-034-0000 26 (“Defendant Muskingham property”). 27 28 2. The loan has since been satisfied and Claimants no longer have an interest in the Defendant Muskingham property. STIPULATION AND ORDER TO WITHDRAW CLAIM -1- 1 3. Accordingly, Claimants hereby withdraw their Claim filed May 30, 2018 2 (Document 7) in the above-captioned case with respect to the Defendant 3 Muskingham property. 4 4. To the extent required under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a), 5 Plaintiff agrees to dismiss with prejudice Claimants in the above-captioned case 6 pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a). Defendant 7 Muskingham property is the in rem defendant. 8 5. Each party hereto is to bear its own costs. 9 6. Claimants are hereby removed from the Service List for the above-captioned 10 case. 11 12 Date: July 15, 2019 CLEMENT, FITZPATRICK & KENWORTHY By: 13 14 15 16 Date: July 17, 2019 /s/ Clayton E. Clement Clayton E. Clement Attorneys for Claimants James Bennett Keegan, Jr. and Diane Elaine Keegan, Trustees of the Keegan Family Trust Dated 9/4/1997 McGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney 17 /s/ Kevin C. Khasigian KEVIN C. KHASIGIAN Assistant U.S. Attorney 18 19 ORDER 20 21 The Court has read and considered the Stipulation to Withdraw Claim by James Bennett 22 Keegan, Jr. and Diane Elaine Keegan, Trustees of the Keegan Family Trust Dated 9/4/1997, and 23 Plaintiff, United States of America, by and through their respective counsel (collectively, the 24 “Parties”). For the reasons stated in the Stipulation and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED as follows: 26 1. The Stipulation is approved. 27 2. Claimants Verified Claim filed May 30, 2018 (Document 7) in the above- 28 captioned case is hereby deemed withdrawn. STIPULATION AND ORDER TO WITHDRAW CLAIM -2- 1 2 3 3. Claimants are hereby deemed dismissed from the above-captioned case. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: July 22, 2019. 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO WITHDRAW CLAIM -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?