USA v. Real Property located at 2033 Bastona Drive, Elk Grove, California, Sacramento County, APN: 119-1860-037-0000 et al
Filing
35
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/22/19 GRANTING the 34 Stipulation for Withdrawal of Verified Claim of Lienholders James Bennett Keegan, Jr. and Diane Elaine Keegan, Trustees of the Keegan Family Trust Dated 9/4/1997; WITHDRAWING Claimants Verified Claim filed 5/30/18 7 ; and DISMISSING Claimants from the above-captioned case. (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
CLAYTON E. CLEMENT State Bar No. 42751
DAVIN R. BACHO State Bar No. 282613
CLEMENT, FITZPATRICK & KENWORTHY
3333 Mendocino Avenue, Suite 200
Santa Rosa, California 95403
Telephone: (707) 523-1181 Facsimile: (707) 546-1360
Email: cclement@cfk.com jlyons@cfk.com
Attorneys for Claimants James Bennett Keegan Jr.
and Diane Elaine Keegan, Trustees of the Keegan
Family Trust Dated 9/4/1997
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
16
17
Case No. 2:18-cv-00799-KJM-CKD
v.
REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2033
BASTONA DRIVE, ELK GROVE,
CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO COUNTY,
APN: 119-1860-037-000, INCLUDING ALL
APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS
THERETO, et al.
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
WITHDRAW VERIFIED CLAIM OF
LIENHOLDERS, JAMES BENNETT
KEEGAN JR. AND DIANE ELAINE
KEEGAN, TRUSTEES
Defendants.
18
19
20
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between claimants James Bennett Keegan, Jr.
21
and Diane Elaine Keegan, Trustees of the Keegan Family Trust Dated 9/4/1997 (“Claimants”), by
22
and through their counsel, and Plaintiff, the United States of America (“Plaintiff”), by and through
23
its undersigned counsel, Kevin C. Khasigian, Assistant U.S. Attorney, as follows:
24
1. Claimants asserted a lienholder interest in the defendant property located at
25
5759 Muskingham Way, Sacramento, CA 95823; APN: 117-1280-034-0000
26
(“Defendant Muskingham property”).
27
28
2. The loan has since been satisfied and Claimants no longer have an interest in
the Defendant Muskingham property.
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO WITHDRAW CLAIM
-1-
1
3. Accordingly, Claimants hereby withdraw their Claim filed May 30, 2018
2
(Document 7) in the above-captioned case with respect to the Defendant
3
Muskingham property.
4
4. To the extent required under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a),
5
Plaintiff agrees to dismiss with prejudice Claimants in the above-captioned case
6
pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a). Defendant
7
Muskingham property is the in rem defendant.
8
5. Each party hereto is to bear its own costs.
9
6. Claimants are hereby removed from the Service List for the above-captioned
10
case.
11
12
Date: July 15, 2019
CLEMENT, FITZPATRICK & KENWORTHY
By:
13
14
15
16
Date: July 17, 2019
/s/ Clayton E. Clement
Clayton E. Clement
Attorneys for Claimants James Bennett
Keegan, Jr. and Diane Elaine Keegan,
Trustees of the Keegan Family Trust Dated
9/4/1997
McGREGOR W. SCOTT
United States Attorney
17
/s/ Kevin C. Khasigian
KEVIN C. KHASIGIAN
Assistant U.S. Attorney
18
19
ORDER
20
21
The Court has read and considered the Stipulation to Withdraw Claim by James Bennett
22
Keegan, Jr. and Diane Elaine Keegan, Trustees of the Keegan Family Trust Dated 9/4/1997, and
23
Plaintiff, United States of America, by and through their respective counsel (collectively, the
24
“Parties”). For the reasons stated in the Stipulation and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY
25
ORDERED as follows:
26
1. The Stipulation is approved.
27
2. Claimants Verified Claim filed May 30, 2018 (Document 7) in the above-
28
captioned case is hereby deemed withdrawn.
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO WITHDRAW CLAIM
-2-
1
2
3
3. Claimants are hereby deemed dismissed from the above-captioned case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: July 22, 2019.
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO WITHDRAW CLAIM
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?