Tate v. Andres
Filing
43
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/14/2020 DENYING as MOOT 42 Motion for Court Ordered Copies. (Henshaw, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DEREK TATE,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:18-cv-0822 KJM AC P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
J. ANDRES, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
18
§ 1983, has filed a motion for a court order directing the law library to provide him with legal
19
copies. ECF No. 42. Plaintiff alleges that the librarian refused to copy his motion to compel
20
discovery because the motion is twenty-five pages and there are seventy-nine pages of exhibits,
21
thereby exceeding the fifty-page limit for indigent inmates. Id. at 2-3. He claims that he is
22
unable to obtain a copy without an order from the court. Id. However, the court has already
23
received plaintiff’s motion to compel, which consists of 136 pages.
24
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for court ordered copies,
25
ECF No. 42, is denied as moot.
26
DATED: January 14, 2020
27
28
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?