Carter v. Brennan

Filing 19

ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 2/4/2020 ADOPTING 18 Findings and Recommendations in full; GRANTING 16 Motion to Dismiss and this action is DISMISSED with prejudice for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the court's order, and The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DARREN CHRISTOPHER CARTER, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:18-cv-0823 MCE AC PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General, Defendant. 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). 20 On December 18, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 18. Neither 23 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 27 28 1. The findings and recommendations filed December 18, 2019 (ECF No. 18), are ADOPTED in full; 1 1 2. Defendant’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 16) is GRANTED and this action is 2 DISMISSED with prejudice for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the court’s 3 order, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) and Local Rule 110; and 4 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: February 4, 2020 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?