Archuleta v. Del Campo et al
Filing
11
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/6/2018 ORDERING Clerk to assign a district judge to this case and RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge William B. Shubb. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
SAMUEL ARCHULETA,
12
13
14
No. 2: 18-cv-0872 KJN P
Plaintiff,
v.
MARTIN DEL CAMPO, et al.,
15
ORDER and FINDINGS &
RECOMMENDATIONS
Defendants.
16
17
By order filed April 13, 2018, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to
18
file an amended complaint was granted. On April 17, 2018, the April 13, 2018 order was re-
19
served on plaintiff at his new address. Thirty days from the date of re-service have now passed,
20
and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order.
21
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall assign a district judge to
22
23
24
this case; and
IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See
Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
25
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
26
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
27
after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections
28
with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned
1
1
“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that
2
3
failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District
4
Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
5
Dated: June 6, 2018
6
7
8
9
Arch872.fta
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?