Reyes v. City of Fairfield et al

Filing 42

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/21/2020 ADOPTING 41 Findings and Recommendations in full; Plaintiff's 5/14/2018 Amended Complaint 8 is DISMISSED without prejudice; and This Action is CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

CHRISTIAN REYES,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:18-cv-0883 JAM DB PS

v.

ORDER

CITY OF FAIRFIELD, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
Plaintiff is proceeding pro se with the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a

17
18

United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).

19

On February 18, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

20

which were served on all parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings

21

and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days after service of the findings and

22

recommendations. The time for filing objections has expired, and no party has filed objections to

23

the findings and recommendations.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

24
25

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.

26

////

27

////

28

////
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed February 18, 2020 (ECF No. 41) are adopted

3
4
5
6

in full;
2. Plaintiff’s May 14, 2018 amended complaint (ECF No. 8) is dismissed without
prejudice; and
3. This action is closed.

7
8

DATED: April 21, 2020
/s/ John A. Mendez____________

9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

_____

\reyes0883.jo

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2