Gosal v. Wells Fargo Bank Home Mortgage Inc.
Filing
11
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 04/23/18 DENYING 9 Motion for TRO and 10 Motion to Expedite. (Benson, A.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
KAMALJIT K. GOSAL,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:18-cv-00908 JAM AC (PS)
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
Defendant.
16
17
Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s
18
motion for a temporary restraining order (ECF No. 9) and plaintiff’s motion to expedite the
19
motion for a temporary restraining order (ECF No. 10). Both of these motions are DENIED.
20
Plaintiff moves for an expedited temporary restraining order to be issued on April 23,
21
2018 to prevent the trustee’s sale of her property, which is scheduled to take place on April 24,
22
2018. ECF No. 9 at 3 and ECF No. 10. Plaintiff’s motions are denied because plaintiff has not
23
shown compliance Local Rule 231(b), which allows the court to consider whether the moving
24
party could have sought relief by motion for preliminary injunction at an earlier date without the
25
necessity for seeking last-minute relief by motion for temporary restraining order. The court
26
finds plaintiff unjustifiably delayed seeking relief. Defendant removed this case on April 13,
27
2018. ECF No. 1. Although documents within the removal papers indicate a motion for a
28
1
1
temporary restraining order was filed with the state court, no such motion was filed in federal
2
court until April 23, 2018, one day in advance of the scheduled foreclosure sale. ECF Nos. 9 and
3
10. Plaintiff makes no statement as to why she did not file her motion for a temporary restraining
4
order contemporaneously with the removal of the complaint. Local Rule 230, which sets the
5
requirements for bringing motions before this court, makes no exception for removed cases.
6
Additionally, a temporary restraining order is not appropriate because plaintiff has not
7
provided all the necessary documents required under Local Rule 231(c), such as an affidavit in
8
support of the existence of an irreparable injury and a provision for a bond within the proposed
9
temporary restraining order. ECF No. 9. To the extent plaintiff intends to seek a preliminary
10
injunction, such a motion must be filed in accordance with Local Rule 231(d) and Federal Rule of
11
Civil Procedure 65(a) and must be noticed for an available calendar date.
12
13
DATED: April 23, 2018
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?