Franklin v. CHCF Stockton Medical Doctor

Filing 5

ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/6/2018 ORDERING Clerk of Court to assign a district judge to this case and RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ALOYSIUS P. FRANKLIN,

12
13
14
15
16

No. 2:18-cv-0943 KJN P

Plaintiff,
ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS

v.
CHCF STOCKTON MEDICAL
DOCTOR,
Defendants.

17
18

By an order filed April 20, 2018, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma

19

pauperis affidavit and a certified copy of his prison trust account statement, and was cautioned

20

that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty

21

day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed

22

the required documents.

23
24

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is
directed to assign a district judge to this case; and

25

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

26

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

27

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

28
1

1

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

2

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

3

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the

4

objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The

5

parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to

6

appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

7

Dated: June 6, 2018

8
9
/fran0943.fifp

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2