Payne v. Baser et al
Filing
30
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 7/25/2019 NOT ADOPTING 28 Findings and Recommendations in full and GRANTING 16 Motion to Dismiss without prejudice. Plaintiff shall file his amended complaint within 20 days. (Huang, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JAVANCE ROSS PAYNE,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
No. 2:18-cv-0956 JAM CKD P
C. BASER, et al.,
15
ORDER
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On May 1, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which
21
were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Defendants have filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
24
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
25
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
26
court does not find the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by
27
proper analysis. Plaintiff admits he did not exhaust his administrative remedies and he has not
28
provided a valid legal excuse for failing to do so. Vaughn v. Hood, 670 F. App’x 962, 963 (9th
1
1
Cir. 2016).
2
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
3
1. The findings and recommendations filed May 1, 2019 are not adopted in full;
4
2. Defendant Baser and Crisanto’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 16) is granted without
5
6
prejudice; and
3. Plaintiff shall file his amended complaint within 20 days.
7
8
9
Dated: July 25, 2019
/s/ John A. Mendez
HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ
United States District Court Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?