Juan Francisco Martinez v. County of Los Angeles, et al

Filing 84

STIPULATION and PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 5/17/2019 re: Production Pursuant to Subpoena Duces Tecum Issued 4/24/19. (York, M)

Download PDF
1 4 DONALD W. COOK, SBN 116666 ATTORNEY AT LAW 3435 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 2910 Los Angeles, CA 90010 (213) 252-9444 / (213) 252-0091 facsimile E-mail: manncook@earthlink.net 5 Attorney for Plaintiff 2 3 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 Case No. 2:18-cv-00964-TLNAC JUAN FRANCISCO MARTINEZ, an individual, PROTECTIVE ORDER RE PRODUCTION PURSUANT TO SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM ISSUED 4/24/19 Plaintiff, 13 14 vs. 15 CITY OF STOCKTON; COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN; SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; and DOES 1-10, both their individual & official capacities, 16 17 18 Defendants. 19 20 Upon the stipulation filed by Plaintiff and non-party California Department of 21 Justice and good cause appearing therefor, the California Department of Justice shall 22 produce the items sought by subpoena duces tecum issued April 24, 2019 (production 23 date 5/10/19) and issued by Plaintiff’s counsel), except that the production shall be 24 subject to a protective order under the following terms: 25 1. 26 Plaintiff, the items may only be disclosed to the Court hearing this matter, the 27 parties’ attorneys, investigators and/or consultants or experts, and 28 representatives, in this lawsuit, for defendant the City of Stockton. The items, DONALD W. COOK. Attorney at Law 3435 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 2910 Los Angeles, CA 90010 ((213) 252-9444 To the extent subpoenaed items pertain to an individual who is NOT the Protective Order Re Production Pursuant to Subpoena duces tecum (Case No. 2:18-cv-00964-TLN-AC) 1 mart0964.third party stip PO_2.ajnw.docx 1 however, shall not be disclosed to Plaintiff (unless the item(s) pertain(s) to 2 Plaintiff and not another individual); 3 2. 4 thereof to any person other than those listed in Paragraph 1, that party shall 5 give written notice by mail and email to counsel for the California Department 6 of Justice so that the Department can make a motion to prevent the disclosure. 7 The notice shall inform the Department to whom disclosure is requested and 8 9 10 11 12 13 If any party wishes to disclose the subpoenaed items, or any portion the purpose thereof. The party wishing to disclose the information will not to do so unless and until agreement with the Department is reached, or the Department’s motion is ruled on by the court. If, however, the Department, does not file its motion within two weeks of the notice, the party wishing to disclose the information may deem the issue to have been abandoned. 3. This Order makes no finding of the relevancy, if any, of the subpoenaed items to the proof of claims and/or defenses asserted by any party in this case. 14 15 DATED: May 17, 2019 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DONALD W. COOK. Attorney at Law 3435 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 2910 Los Angeles, CA 90010 ((213) 252-9444 Protective Order Re Production Pursuant to Subpoena duces tecum (Case No. 2:18-cv-00964-TLN-AC) 2 mart0964.third party stip PO_2.ajnw.docx

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?