Iegorova v. Light House Apartments
Filing
4
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 8/2/18, RECOMMENDING that Plaintiff's complaint should be dismissed without further leave to amend; the Clerk should be instructed to close this case; no certificate of appealability should be issued. Within 20 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. Matter REFERRED to District Judge John A. Mendez. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LIUDMYLA IEGOROVA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:18-cv-00971-JAM-GGH
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
v.
LIGHT HOUSE APARTMENTS,
15
Defendant.
16
17
18
Plaintiff filed her complaint pro se on April 19, 2018, ECF No. 1, and was granted in
19
forma pauperis status on May 29, 2018. ECF No. 3 at 17-19. On the same date this court
20
dismissed plaintiff’s complaint for failing to state a basis for jurisdiction in this federal district
21
court and gave plaintiff 45 days in which to file an amended complaint that conformed to the
22
instructions given in the Order. ECF No. 3.
23
24
Plaintiff, however, did not file any amended complaint thereby apparently conceding that
she could not do so under the limits explained in the court’s Order.
25
In light of the foregoing IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that:
26
1.
Plaintiff’s complaint should be dismissed without further leave to amend;
27
2.
The Clerk should be instructed to close this case;
28
1
1
3.
2
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
3
assigned to this case pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within twenty days
4
after being served with these findings and recommendations plaintiff may file written objections
5
with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings
6
and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified
7
time may waive her right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153
8
(9th Cir. 1991).
9
Dated: August 2, 2018
10
No certificate of appealability should be issued.
/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?