Brown v. Benavidez et al
Filing
43
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 08/31/20 DENYING 42 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Plummer, M)
Case 2:18-cv-01015-KJM-EFB Document 43 Filed 08/31/20 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ELI’EZER RE’UEL BEN-BINYAMIN,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:18-cv-1015-KJM-EFB P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
J. BENAVIDEZ, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42
18
U.S.C. § 1983. He requests that the court appoint him counsel and modify the discovery and
19
scheduling order so that appointed counsel can assist him with discovery. ECF No. 42.
20
District courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in section
21
1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In exceptional
22
circumstances, the court may request an attorney to voluntarily to represent such a plaintiff. See
23
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1); Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v.
24
Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). When determining whether “exceptional
25
circumstances” exist, the court must consider the likelihood of success on the merits as well as the
26
ability of the plaintiff to articulate his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues
27
involved. Palmer v. Valdez, 560 F.3d 965, 970 (9th Cir. 2009). Having considered those factors,
28
the court finds there are no exceptional circumstances in this case. In light of this denial,
1
Case 2:18-cv-01015-KJM-EFB Document 43 Filed 08/31/20 Page 2 of 2
1
plaintiff’s motion to modify the discovery and scheduling order, which is premised on counsel
2
being appointed for plaintiff, is denied as moot.
3
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff’s request for appointment of counsel and to
4
modify the discovery and scheduling order (ECF No. 42) is DENIED without prejudice.
5
DATED: August 31, 2020.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?