O'Connor v. Perez et al

Filing 48

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 10/30/19 DENYING 46 Motion for Discovery. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GLENN O’CONNOR, 12 No. 2:18-cv-1057 DB P Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 W. PEREZ, et al., 15 ORDER Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 17 18 1983. Plaintiff claims defendants violated his Eighth Amendment rights. Presently before the 19 court is plaintiff’s motion for discovery. (ECF No. 46.) 20 By order dated May 24, 2019, the court referred this case to the Post-Screening ADR 21 (Alternative Dispute Resolution) Project. (ECF No. 33.) On October 10, 2019, a settlement 22 conference was held in this action. (ECF No. 44.) The case did not settle. Thereafter, the court 23 lifted the stay and directed defendants to file a responsive pleading within twenty-one days. The 24 court will deny plaintiff’s motion for discovery because defendants have yet to file a responsive 25 pleading. Once the defendants have filed an answer the court will issue a discovery and 26 scheduling order. 27 //// 28 //// 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for discovery (ECF No. 1 2 46) is denied. 3 Dated: October 30, 2019 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DLB:12 11 DLB:1/Orders/Prisoner/Civil.Rights/ocon1057.mt4disc 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?