O'Connor v. Perez et al
Filing
48
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 10/30/19 DENYING 46 Motion for Discovery. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
GLENN O’CONNOR,
12
No. 2:18-cv-1057 DB P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
W. PEREZ, et al.,
15
ORDER
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. §
17
18
1983. Plaintiff claims defendants violated his Eighth Amendment rights. Presently before the
19
court is plaintiff’s motion for discovery. (ECF No. 46.)
20
By order dated May 24, 2019, the court referred this case to the Post-Screening ADR
21
(Alternative Dispute Resolution) Project. (ECF No. 33.) On October 10, 2019, a settlement
22
conference was held in this action. (ECF No. 44.) The case did not settle. Thereafter, the court
23
lifted the stay and directed defendants to file a responsive pleading within twenty-one days. The
24
court will deny plaintiff’s motion for discovery because defendants have yet to file a responsive
25
pleading. Once the defendants have filed an answer the court will issue a discovery and
26
scheduling order.
27
////
28
////
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for discovery (ECF No.
1
2
46) is denied.
3
Dated: October 30, 2019
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
DLB:12
11
DLB:1/Orders/Prisoner/Civil.Rights/ocon1057.mt4disc
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?