United States of America v. Peery
Filing
60
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 01/15/19 ADOPTING 54 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full; DENYING 47 Motion to Dismiss. (Benson, A.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:18-cv-1074 JAM AC PS
v.
ORDER
NEWMAN S. PERRY, JR.,
15
Defendant.
16
Defendant is proceeding in this action in pro per. The matter was referred to a United
17
18
States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).
19
On November 15, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
20
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
21
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 54.
22
Defendant has filed amended objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 56.
23
Plaintiff has filed a response to the amended objections. ECF No. 57.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
24
25
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
26
court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
27
analysis.
28
////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed November 15, 2018, are adopted in full; and
3
2. Defendant’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 47) is denied.
4
5
6
7
DATED: January 15, 2019
/s/ John A. Mendez____________
_____
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?