Goudiaby v. Equifax, Inc. et al

Filing 10

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 5/29/2018 ORDERING that the deadline for Credit One to respond to the 1 Complaint shall be CONTINUED to 6/13/2018. (Washington, S)

Download PDF
REED SMITH LLP A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 1 Tuan Uong (SBN 272447) Email: tuong@reedsmith.com 2 REED SMITH LLP 355 South Grand Avenue 3 Suite 2900 Los Angeles, CA 90071-1514 4 Telephone: +1 213 457 8000 Facsimile: +1 213 457 8080 5 Le T. Duong (SBN 297662) lduong@reedsmith.com 6 Email: REED SMITH LLP 7 101 Second Street Suite 1800 8 San Francisco, CA 94105-3659 Telephone: +1 415 543 8700 9 Facsimile: +1 415 391 8269 10 Attorneys for Defendant Credit One Bank, N.A. 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION 14 15 ADAMA GOUDIABY, 16 17 Plaintiff, v. 18 Equifax, Inc.; Credit One Bank, N.A., TFC Credit 19 Corporation, and DOES 1 through 100 inclusive, 20 21 Defendants. Case No. 2:18-cv-01078-MCE-KJN STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT CREDIT ONE BANK, N.A.’S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; ORDER THEREON Compl. Filed: April 30, 2018 Honorable Morrison C. England Honorable Kendall J. Newman 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT CREDIT ONE BANK, N.A.’S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; ORDER THEREON 1 This Joint Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint to June 13, 2018 is made by 2 and between Plaintiff Adama Goudiaby (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Credit One Bank, N.A. (“Credit 3 One”) through their respective counsel, in light of the following facts: RECITALS 4 5 On May 2, 2018, Plaintiff served her Complaint on Credit One. 6 Credit One’s response to Plaintiff’s Complaint is due on or before May 23, 2018. 7 The parties agree to extend Credit One’s time to respond to the Complaint to June 13, 2018, 8 in order to give Credit One additional time to investigate Plaintiff’s claims and prepare a proper 9 response, and for the parties to potentially reach a resolution of this matter. REED SMITH LLP A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 10 There is good cause to extend Credit One’s response deadline because Credit One requires 11 additional time to investigate Plaintiff’s allegations and prepare a proper response, and the parties 12 require additional time to consider a resolution of this matter. 13 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 144, Plaintiff and Credit One stipulate that Credit One’s time to 14 respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint is extended to June 13, 2018. 15 This change in deadline will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by 16 Court order, local rules, or the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 17 THEREFORE, the parties stipulate as follows: 18 STIPULATION 19 The deadline for Credit One to respond to the Complaint shall be continued to June 13, 2018. 20 This change in deadline will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by 21 the Court order, local rules, or the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// –1– STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT CREDIT ONE BANK, N.A.’S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; ORDER THEREON 1 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 2 3 4 DATED: May 23, 2018 5 REED SMITH LLP By: /s/ Le Duong Tuan Uong Le T. Duong Attorneys for Defendant Credit One Bank, N.A. 6 7 8 9 DATED: May 23, 2018 REED SMITH LLP A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 10 By: 11 12 13 14 15 16 SAGARIA LAW, P.C. /s/ Elliot Gale Elliot Gale [As authorized on May 23, 2018] Attorney for Plaintiff Adama Goudiaby IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 29, 2018 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 –2– STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT CREDIT ONE BANK, N.A.’S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; ORDER THEREON

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?