Canfield v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al

Filing 44

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 7/29/2021 DENYING without prejudice plaintiff's 43 motion to compel. (Yin, K)

Case 2:18-cv-01092-KJM-DMC Document 44 Filed 07/29/21 Page 1 of 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DONALD CANFIELD,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:18-CV-1092-KJM-DMC-P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

NARINDER SAUKHLA, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17
18
19

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to
42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to compel, ECF No. 43.
Plaintiff’s motion is defective. Plaintiff seeks to compel further responses to

20

requests for production. While Plaintiff states that the discovery requests at issue are attached to

21

his motion as Exhibit 1, there is no Exhibit 1 accompanying Plaintiff’s motion. Moreover,

22

Plaintiff has not provided the Court with a copy of Defendants’ allegedly deficient responses.

23

Absent a copy of the discovery and responses at issue, it is impossible for the Court to evaluate

24

Plaintiff’s motion, which is denied without prejudice.

25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26

Dated: July 29, 2021

____________________________________
DENNIS M. COTA
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

27
28
1