Boddie v. Martel et al
Filing
14
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 7/14/2020 ADOPTING IN FULL 13 Findings and Recommendations. This action is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute and for failure to obey a court order. CASE CLOSED. (Tupolo, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ALEXANDER BODDIE,
12
13
14
No. 2:18-cv-01196-TLN-AC
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
MICHAEL MARTEL, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1.) The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
19
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On June 10, 2020, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations herein
21
which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. (ECF No. 13.) Plaintiff
23
has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
24
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
27
28
1. The findings and recommendations filed on June 10, 2020 (ECF No. 13), are
ADOPTED IN FULL; and
1
1
2. This action is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute and for failure to obey a court
2
order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); see also L.R. 110. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the
3
case.
4
DATED: July 14, 2020
5
6
7
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?