Aleem v. Lizarraga et al
Filing
68
ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/30/2021 ADOPTING the findings and recommendations filed 12/21/2020 (ECF No. 60 ) in full; DENYING Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction (ECF No. 57 ); and REFERRING this matter back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial proceedings. (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
FAROOQ ABDUL ALEEM,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2: 18-cv-1210 KJM CKD P
v.
ORDER
J. LIZARRAGA, et al.
15
Defendants.
16
On December 21, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which
17
18
were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and
19
recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. That period has passed, plaintiff has
20
not objected to the findings and recommendations.
The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States,
21
22
602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed
23
de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law
24
by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court
25
. . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be
26
supported by the record and by the proper analysis.
27
/////
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed December 21, 2020 (ECF No. 60) are adopted
3
in full;
4
2. Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction (ECF No. 57) is denied; and
5
3. This matter is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial
6
proceedings.
7
DATED: March 30, 2021.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?