Steward v. Lynch et al
Filing
35
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/22/2020 ORDERING Supervising Deputy Attorney General Monica Anderson to address 33 and 34 Motions for Injunctive Relief within 14 days from the date of this order. (cc: Supervising Deputy Attorney General Monica Anderson) (Henshaw, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DONNY STEWARD,
12
13
14
No. 2: 18-cv-1227 KJM KJN P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
LYNCH, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant
18
to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court plaintiff’s motions for a preliminary injunction.
19
(ECF Nos. 33 & 34.) For the reasons stated herein, the undersigned orders briefing on plaintiff’s
20
motions.
21
Background
22
On March 23, 2020, plaintiff’s amended complaint was dismissed, and plaintiff was
23
granted sixty days in which to file a second amended complaint. Thus, no operative pleading is
24
on file, and no defendant has yet been served with process.
25
26
27
28
Plaintiff states he did not receive the order until April 2, 2020. (ECF No. 33 at 1.)
Plaintiff’s Motions
Plaintiff avers that on March 9, 2020, he was transferred from Kern Valley State Prison
(“KVSP”) to the California Health Care Facility (“CHCF”) initially on a “treat and return” basis.
1
1
However, plaintiff’s primary care physician Dr. Singh at CHCF has advised plaintiff that his
2
return to KVSP depends on plaintiff’s health, and may be permanent. (ECF Nos. 33 at 2; 34 at 2.)
3
Plaintiff has been housed at CHCF since March 9, 2020, and neither his hypertension nor his
4
heart problems have been normalized. (ECF No. 33 at 2.) Plaintiff contends his legal property
5
should have been transferred with him, but that it was retained at KVSP receiving and release. In
6
addition to the deadline set in this case, plaintiff states that he has orders from the Ninth Circuit
7
Court of Appeal and two other civil complaints with fourteen and thirty day deadlines to reply.
8
(ECF No. 33 at 2.) Plaintiff cannot comply with such deadlines without access to his legal
9
property. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, plaintiff has no access to the prison law library.
10
In addition, plaintiff filed an emergency appeal concerning his legal property on March
11
10, 2020, but the due date for the administrative appeal response is April 24, 2020.
12
The All Writs Act
13
Under the All Writs Act, federal courts “may issue all writs necessary or appropriate in
14
aid of their respective jurisdictions and agreeable to the usages and principles of law.” 28 U.S.C.
15
§ 1651(a). “The power conferred by the Act extends, under appropriate circumstances, to persons
16
who, though not parties to the original action or engaged in wrongdoing, are in a position to
17
frustrate the implementation of a court order or the proper administration of justice, and
18
encompasses even those who have not taken any affirmative action to hinder justice.” United
19
States v. New York Tel. Co., 434 U.S. 159, 174 (1977) (footnote and citations omitted).
20
Discussion
21
In light of plaintiff’s alleged inability to meet court deadlines absent receipt of his legal
22
property, particularly when faced with no access to the prison law library due to the current
23
COVID-19 pandemic, the court directs Supervising Deputy Attorney General Monica Anderson
24
to address plaintiff’s motions for injunctive relief.
25
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
26
1. Within fourteen days from the date of this order, Supervising Deputy Attorney General
27
Monica Anderson shall address plaintiff’s motions for injunctive relief (ECF Nos. 33 & 34)
28
concerning return of his legal materials; and
2
1
2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve this order and a copy of plaintiff’s motions
2
(ECF Nos. 33 & 34) on Supervising Deputy Attorney General Monica Anderson.
3
Dated: April 22, 2020
4
5
6
/stew1227.fb
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?