Strong v. City of Vallejo et al

Filing 29

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 6/12/2020: Within 14 days from the date of this order, counsel for plaintiff shall file a brief which sets forth all arguments, and which cites to and thoroughly discusses all caselaw or other authority that may support those arguments, in opposition to defendant's motion to dismiss each claim which plaintiff does not agree to voluntarily dismiss. Defendant may have 7 days to reply to such brief. (Kirksey Smith, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

----oo0oo----

11
12

ROBERT STRONG,
Plaintiff,

13
14
15
16
17

No. 2:18-cv-01246 WBS AC

v.

ORDER

CITY OF VALLEJO, JARRETT TONN,
ANDREW BIDOU, and DOE VALLEJO
POLICE OFFICERS 1-25,
Defendants.

18
----oo0oo----

19
20

In response to the court’s request for plaintiff to

21

clarify his position regarding defendants’ motion for summary

22

judgment on plaintiff’s state law and Monell claims (Docket No.

23

27), plaintiff responded that he conceded only one of the claims

24

and could provide supplemental briefing on the remaining claims.

25

(Docket No. 28.)

26

this order, counsel for plaintiff shall file a brief which sets

27

forth all arguments, and which cites to and thoroughly discusses

28

all caselaw or other authority that may support those arguments,

Accordingly, within 14 days from the date of

1

1

in opposition to defendant’s motion to dismiss each claim which

2

plaintiff does not agree to voluntarily dismiss.

3

have 7 days to reply to such brief.

4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

June 12, 2020

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

Defendant may