Arnold R. Ecklund v. Frazier et al
Filing
14
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/11/2018 DIRECTING the Clerk to randomly assign a U.S. District Judge to this case and RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
ARNOLD RAY ECKLUND,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
No. 2:18-cv-1247-EFB P
v.
ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
FRAZZIER, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42
16
17
U.S.C. § 1983. This action was transferred from the United States District Court for the Northern
18
District of California to this court on May 9, 2018. On May 31, 2018, this court found that,
19
although plaintiff sought leave to proceed in forma pauperis, he had failed to submit a correct and
20
complete application in the Northern District before transfer. Accordingly, the court directed the
21
Clerk to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, ordered plaintiff to
22
submit the completed application within thirty days and warned plaintiff that failure to do so may
23
result in this action being dismissed. ECF No. 12. The time for acting has passed and plaintiff
24
has not submitted the completed application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis or otherwise
25
responded to the court’s order.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to randomly assign a United States
26
27
District Judge to this case.
28
/////
1
Further, it is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.
2
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
3
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
4
after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written
5
objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned
6
“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the
7
objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The
8
parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to
9
appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez
10
v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
11
Dated: July 11, 2018.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?