Neal v. State of California et al
Filing
26
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/2/2019 RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROBERT W. NEAL,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2: 18-cv-1259 KJM KJN P
v.
FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
By order filed August 22, 2019, the undersigned granted plaintiff thirty days to file an
17
18
amended complaint. (ECF No. 25.) Thirty days from that date have now passed, and plaintiff has
19
not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
20
21
prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
22
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
23
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
24
after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections
25
with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned
26
“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that
27
////
28
////
1
1
failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District
2
Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
3
Dated: October 2, 2019
4
5
6
Neal1259.fta
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?