Neal v. State of California et al

Filing 27

ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/6/2019 ADOPTING in FULL 25 , 26 Findings and Recommendations, and this action is DISMISSED. CASE CLOSED (Reader, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ROBERT W. NEAL,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:18-cv-1259 KJM KJN P

v.

ORDER

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief

17
18

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided

19

by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

20

On August 22, 2019 and October 2, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and

21

recommendations, which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any

22

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff

23

has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United

24
25

States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are

26

reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations

27

of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate]

28

/////
1

1

court . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be

2

supported by the record and by the proper analysis.

3

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

4

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 22, 2019 and October 2, 2019 are

5
6
7

adopted in full; and
2. This action is dismissed.
DATED: November 6, 2019.

8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2