Davis v. Seihel et al

Filing 42

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/11/2020 ADOPTING 41 Findings and Recommendations in full and DENYING plaintiff's 40 Motion for a temporary restraining order and/or preliminary injunction. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JEROME MARKIEL DAVIS, 12 13 14 No. 2:18-cv-01261-TLN-EFB Plaintiff, v. ORDER KIMBERLY SEIHEL, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On December 12, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 41.) Neither 23 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 27 28 1. The findings and recommendations filed December 12, 2019 (ECF No. 41), are adopted in full; and 1 1 2 3 4 2. Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order and/or preliminary injunction (ECF No. 40) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 11, 2020 5 6 7 8 9 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?