Davis v. Seihel et al
Filing
42
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/11/2020 ADOPTING 41 Findings and Recommendations in full and DENYING plaintiff's 40 Motion for a temporary restraining order and/or preliminary injunction. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JEROME MARKIEL DAVIS,
12
13
14
No. 2:18-cv-01261-TLN-EFB
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
KIMBERLY SEIHEL, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On December 12, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
21
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 41.) Neither
23
party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
24
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
27
28
1. The findings and recommendations filed December 12, 2019 (ECF No. 41), are
adopted in full; and
1
1
2
3
4
2. Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order and/or preliminary injunction (ECF
No. 40) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 11, 2020
5
6
7
8
9
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?