Rhoades v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
24
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 1/23/2020 ADOPTING 23 Findings and Recommendations, APPROVING the 22 Stipulation as to plaintiff's receipt of EAJA fees. (Coll, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JEFFREY R. RHOADES,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
No. 2:18-cv-1264 JAM KJN
ORDER
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
Defendant.
16
17
On October 31, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
18
which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings
19
and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.
20
Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v.
21
United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are
22
reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.
23
1983).
24
The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,
25
concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.
26
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:
27
1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed October 31, 2019, are
28
1
1
2
3
ADOPTED;
2. The parties’ stipulation as to plaintiff’s receipt of Equal Access to Justice Act
(“EAJA”) fees under 28 U.S.C. Section 2412(d) (ECF No. 22) is approved.
4
5
6
7
DATED: January 23, 2020
/s/ John A. Mendez____________
_____
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?