Rhoades v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 30

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 11/10/2020 ADOPTING 29 Findings and Recommendations in full. Plaintiff is awarded $6,900.00 in fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (see ECF No. 25 ). (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JEFFREY R RHOADES, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 2:18-cv-1264-JAM-KJN ORDER ON EAJA FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. (ECF Nos. 25, 29.) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. 16 On October 7, 2020 the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 17 18 29), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the 19 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. No objections were 20 filed. Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United 21 22 States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 23 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 24 1983). 25 The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, 26 concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the findings and recommendations in full. Accordingly, 27 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 28 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 29) are ADOPTED IN FULL; 1 1 2 2. Plaintiff is awarded $6,900.00 in fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (see ECF No. 25). 3 4 5 6 DATED: November 10, 2020 /s/ John A. Mendez THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?