Rhoades v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
32
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 11/16/2020 GRANTING 31 Motion to Amend the Judgment. The 11/12/2020 order is amended nunc protunc to delete page 2, lines 1-2, and in its place substitute the following:2. The Commissioner shall pay counsel in this case the sum of $14,047.41 in attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b); and 3. Plaintiff's counsel shall reimburse plaintiff $6,900 in previously awarded EAJA fees. (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JEFFREY R RHOADES,
12
13
14
15
16
17
Plaintiff,
No. 2:18-cv-1264-JAM-KJN
ORDER
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
Defendant.
On October 16, 2020 the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations to award
18
attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). (ECF No. 29.) Thereafter, the undersigned adopted the
19
findings and recommendations in full. (ECF No. 30.) Plaintiff now moves under Rule 60(a) to
20
correct the court’s order, as that order inadvertently referenced a previous EAJA award. (ECF
21
No. 31.) Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED. The November 12, 2020 order is amended nunc pro
22
tunc to delete page 2, lines 1-2, and in its place substitute the following:
23
24
25
2. The Commissioner shall pay counsel in this case the sum of $14,047.41 in attorney’s
fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b); and
3. Plaintiff’s counsel shall reimburse plaintiff $6,900 in previously awarded EAJA fees.
26
27
28
DATED: November 16, 2020
/s/ John A. Mendez
THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?