Rhoades v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 32

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 11/16/2020 GRANTING 31 Motion to Amend the Judgment. The 11/12/2020 order is amended nunc protunc to delete page 2, lines 1-2, and in its place substitute the following:2. The Commissioner shall pay counsel in this case the sum of $14,047.41 in attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b); and 3. Plaintiff's counsel shall reimburse plaintiff $6,900 in previously awarded EAJA fees. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JEFFREY R RHOADES, 12 13 14 15 16 17 Plaintiff, No. 2:18-cv-1264-JAM-KJN ORDER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. On October 16, 2020 the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations to award 18 attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). (ECF No. 29.) Thereafter, the undersigned adopted the 19 findings and recommendations in full. (ECF No. 30.) Plaintiff now moves under Rule 60(a) to 20 correct the court’s order, as that order inadvertently referenced a previous EAJA award. (ECF 21 No. 31.) Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED. The November 12, 2020 order is amended nunc pro 22 tunc to delete page 2, lines 1-2, and in its place substitute the following: 23 24 25 2. The Commissioner shall pay counsel in this case the sum of $14,047.41 in attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b); and 3. Plaintiff’s counsel shall reimburse plaintiff $6,900 in previously awarded EAJA fees. 26 27 28 DATED: November 16, 2020 /s/ John A. Mendez THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?