Harmon v. BMW of North America, LLC

Filing 31

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 8/27/19 ORDERING that the scheduling order is AMENDED as follows: Motion for Summary Judgment due 8/27/2019, hearing on the motion is for 9/24/2019 at 1:30 p.m., and the joint pretrial statement is due on 11/1/2019. The Pretrial Conference is SET for 11/8/2019 at 10:00 AM and the Jury Trial is SET for 1/13/2020 at 09:00 AM, in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez. (Kastilahn, A)

1 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP
ROGER S. RAPHAEL, SB# 111946
2
Email: [e-mail]
RICHARD B. CURTIS, SB# 124212
3
Email: [e-mail]
333 Bush Street, Suite 1100
4 San Francisco, California 94104-2872
Telephone: [phone]
5 Facsimile: 415.434.0882
6 Attorneys for Defendant, BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC
7 LAW OFFICES OF JON JACOBS
TERRY L. BAKER, SB# 214365
8
Email: [e-mail]
RENE J. DUPART, SB# 289956
9
Email: [e-mail]
5701 Lonetree Blvd., Suite 202
10 Rocklin, CA 95765
Telephone: [phone]
11 Facsimile: 916.663.6500
12 Attorney for Plaintiff, JOSHUA HARMON
13
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION

16
17 JOSHUA HARMON, an individual,

CASE NO. 2:18-cv-01551-JAM-DB

18

STIPULATION OF PARTIES RE:

19

Plaintiff,
vs.

AMENDMENTS TO THE COURT’S
SCHEDULING ORDER; ORDER

20 BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, a
Delaware Limited Liability Company, and
21 DOES 1 to 20, inclusive,
22

Defendants.

23
24

Plaintiff JOSHUA HARMON (hereinafter, “Plaintiff”) and BMW OF NORTH OF

25 NORTH AMERICA, LLC (“BMW NA” or “Defendant”) hereby stipulate as follows:
26
27

LEWI
S 

BRISBOI
S 
BISGAARD

RECITALS
1.

In order that the parties have sufficient time to explore a potential resolution of this

28 action without consuming this Court’s time, as well as possibly saving the parties to this lawsuit
4835-3477-9554.1
2:18-cv-01551-JAM-DB
1
STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE COURT’S SCHEDULING ORDER;
[PROPOSED] ORDER

1 an unnecessary expense of time and money, the undersigned counsel for Plaintiff met and
2 conferred with Defendant’s counsel. Counsel for the Parties agreed to request that the Court
3 amend its initial Case Management and Pretrial Order for Jury Trial as stated below.
4
5

STIPULATION

6

WHEREFORE, the Parties stipulate and request as follows:

7

That the Court amend its initial Case Management and Pretrial Order for Jury Trial to

8 continue the assigned dates for this case, as closely as possible subject to the Court’s calendar, as
9 follows:
10

MSJ filing:

8/27/2019;

11

Hearing date for MSJ:

9/24/2019 at 1:30 p.m.

12

Joint pretrial statement due:

11/1/19;

13

Pretrial conference:

11/8/19 @ 10:00 a.m.

14

Jury trial:

1/13/20 at 9:00 a.m.

15

It is so stipulated.

16
17 DATED: August 27, 2019

LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH

LLP

18
By: /s/ Richard B. Curtis
Roger S. Raphael
Richard B. Curtis
Attorneys for Defendant, BMWOFNORTHAMERICA,LLC

19
20
21 DATED: August 27, 2019

LAW OFFICES OF JON JACOBS

22
By: /S/ Terry L. Baker
Terry L. Baker
Rene J. Dupart
Attorneys for Plaintiff, JOSHUA HARMON

23
24
25
26
27

LEWI
S 

BRISBOI
S 
BISGAARD

28
4835-3477-9554.1

2:18-cv-01551-JAM-DB
2
STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE COURT’S SCHEDULING ORDER;
[PROPOSED] ORDER

1
2

ORDER
Having read and considered the stipulation of the Parties set forth above and finding merit

3 in the requested changes in the scheduling order,
4

THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS AND DECREES that the scheduling order be, and

5 hereby is, AMENDED as follows:
6
7

MSJ filing:

8/27/2019;

8

Hearing date for MSJ:

9/24/2019 at 1:30 p.m.

9

Joint pretrial statement due:

11/1/19;

10

Pretrial conference:

11/8/19 @ 10:00 a.m.

11

Jury trial:

1/13/20 at 9:00 a.m.

12
13

IT IS SO ORDERED.

14
15

Dated: August 27, 2019

16

/s/ John A. Mendez______________
The Honorable JOHN A. MENDEZ
United States District Court
Eastern District of California

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

LEWI
S 

BRISBOI
S 
BISGAARD

28
4835-3477-9554.1

2:18-cv-01551-JAM-DB
3
STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE COURT’S SCHEDULING ORDER;
[PROPOSED] ORDER