Concepcion v. Fidelity Investments

Filing 22

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 8/27/2018 ORDERING that defendant's 10 Motion to Dismiss will be heard on 10/16/2018 at 1:30 p.m. Plaintiffs' 14 Motion to Remand will be heard on 10/16/2018 at 1:30 p.m. Any opposition or replies to the Motions will be filed and served per the Local Rules and in accordance with the new hearing date. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 LAW OFFICES OF JON A DeRONDE, JR. John A. DeRonde, Jr. CFLS (SBN 59289) E-mail: derondelaw@sbcglobal.net 416 Merganser Place Davis, CA 95616 Telephone: (707) 631-8700 Facsimile: (707) 756-1446 Attorney for Plaintiffs DELORES CONCEPCION; and ESTATE OF NANCY TOBIAS 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP Aaron Belzer, Esq. (State Bar No. 238901) E-mail: abelzer@seyfarth.com Julie M. Kamps (admitted pro hac vice) Email: jkamps@seyfarth.com 2029 Century Park East, Suite 3500 Los Angeles, CA 90067-3021 Telephone: (310) 277-7200 Facsimile: (310) 201-5219 Attorneys for Defendant FIDELITY WORKPLACE SERVICES, LLC (incorrectly identified as “Fidelity Investments”) 15 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA| 18 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 DELORES CONCEPCION; ESTATE OF NANCY TOBIAS, ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) FIDELITY INVESTMENTS, and DOES 1-10, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:18-CV-01561-JAM-KJN JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE ON: (1) DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS (2) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND [L.R. 230(f); L.R. 143] 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE; CASE NO. 2:18-CV-01561-JAM-KJN 1 WHEREAS, on July 24, 2018 Defendant Fidelity Workplace Services, LLC (incorrectly 2 named Fidelity Investments)(“Defendant”) filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint, and 3 noticed the Motion for hearing on October 2, 2018 (Dkt. #10); 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 WHEREAS, on July 30, 2018, Plaintiff Delores Concepcion filed a Motion to Remand, and also noticed the Motion for hearing on October 2, 2018 (Dkt. #15); WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ counsel will be out of town between September 27, 2018 and October 10, 2018 and unavailable to appear at the hearing on the pending motions; WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred in good faith, and have agreed to continue the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand; NOW THEREFORE, the Parties, by and through their counsel, stipulate to continue the 11 hearing on the motions to October 16, 2018, or as soon thereafter as the Court may hear the 12 motions, with any oppositions or replies to be filed and served per the Local Rules and in 13 accordance with the new hearing date. 14 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 15 DATED: August 24, 2018 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 16 17 By: /s/ Aaron Belzer Destiny Brown 18 Attorneys for Defendant FIDELITY WORKPLACE SERVICES, LLC 19 20 21 DATED: August 24, 2018 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN A. DERONDE, JR. 22 By: /s/ John A. DeRonde, Jr. (with consent) John A. DeRonde, Jr. 23 24 Attorneys for Plaintiffs DELORES CONCEPCION and THE ESTATE OF NANCY TOBIAS 25 26 27 Pursuant to Local Rule 131(e), counsel for Plaintiffs has authorized submission of this document on his behalf. 28 -2JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE; CASE NO. 2:18-CV-01561-JAM-KJN 1 ORDER 2 The Court, having reviewed the foregoing Stipulation to Continue the Hearing on 3 Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand, and good cause appearing, 4 hereby orders that: 5 1. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss will be heard on October 16, 2018 at 1:30 p.m.; 6 2. Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand will be heard on October 16, 2018 at 1:30 p.m.; 7 3. Any opposition or replies to the Motions will be filed and served per the Local 8 9 Rules and in accordance with the new hearing date. IT IS SO ORDERED 10 11 DATED: __8/27/2018__________________ /s/ John A. Mendez Hon. John A. Mendez United States District Court Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3- JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE; CASE NO. 2:18-CV-01561-JAM-KJN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?