Krecz v. Google Inc.
Filing
35
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 1/28/2021 ADOPTING in full the 32 findings and recommendations ; DENYING Plaintiff's 31 motion to reopen this case; and the case remains Closed. (Becknal, R) Modified on 1/29/2021 (Streeter, J).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOSEPH KRECZ,
12
No. 2:18-cv-01585-JAM-CKD
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
GOOGLE INC.,
15
ORDER
(ECF Nos. 31, 32.)
Defendant.
16
On January 4, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF
17
18
No. 32), which were served on the parties. On January 11, 2021, plaintiff filed objections to the
19
findings and recommendations (ECF No. 33), which have been considered by the court.
This court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which an
20
21
objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore
22
Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981); see also Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d
23
930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009). As to any portion of the proposed findings of fact to which no objection
24
has been made, the court assumes its correctness and decides the matter on the applicable law.
25
See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s
26
conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d
27
452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).
28
////
1
1
The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,
2
concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the findings and recommendations in full. Accordingly,
3
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
4
1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 32) are ADOPTED IN FULL;
5
2. Plaintiff’s motion to reopen this case (ECF No. 31) is DENIED; and
6
3. The case remains Closed.
7
8
9
10
DATED: January 28, 2021
/s/ John A. Mendez
THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?