Woods v. Sanders et al

Filing 4

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/7/2018 ORDERING CASE TRANSFERRED to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. (Henshaw, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JESSIE JAMES WOODS, 12 No. 2:18-cv-1618 CKD P Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 CONNNIE SANDERS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a Contra Costa County prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action 17 18 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The federal venue statute provides that a civil action “may be 19 brought in (1) a judicial district in which any defendant resides, if all defendants are residents of 20 the State in which the district is located, (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the 21 events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of property that is the 22 subject of the action is situated, or (3) if there is no district in which an action may otherwise be 23 brought as provided in this action, any judicial district in which any defendant is subject to the 24 court’s personal jurisdiction with respect to such action.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). 25 In this case, there is no allegation in the complaint that any defendant resides within the 26 Eastern District and it is alleged that the actions giving rise to plaintiff’s claims occurred in the 27 Northern District. In the interest of justice, a federal court may transfer a complaint filed in the 28 ///// 1 1 wrong district to the correct district. See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a); Starnes v. McGuire, 512 F.2d 918, 2 932 (D.C. Cir. 1974). 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is transferred to the United 4 States District Court for the Northern District of California. 5 Dated: June 7, 2018 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 wood1618.21a 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?