Blakely et al v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc.

Filing 16

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 7/26/18 GRANTING 15 Stipulation to Stay Case Pending Appeal. (Kaminski, H)

1 MCGUIREWOODS LLP
David S. Reidy (SBN 225904)
2 [e-mail]
Jamie D. Wells (SBN 290827)
3 [e-mail]
Anthony Q. Le (SBN 300660)
4 [e-mail]
Two Embarcadero Center
5 Suite 1300
San Francisco, CA 94111
6 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.844.9922
7
Attorneys for Defendant
8 Santander Consumer USA, Inc.
9 TRYK LAW, PC
Benjamin P. Tryk
10 [e-mail]
7050 N. Fresno St., #210
11 Fresno, CA 93720
12 DAVIS & NORRIS, LLP
Wesley W. Barnett
13 [e-mail]
2154 Highland Avenue South
14 Birmingham, AL 35205
15 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
16
17
18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - FRESNO DIVISION

19
VICKI BLAKELY, STEVEN LAWSON,
20 CHRISTY MITCHELL, LESLIE
WILLIAMS, JAMES ROLLAND,
21 JAYNELLIS SALINAS, KATHLEEN
JONES, ANNIE BLUITT, SAMUEL
22 CARTER, & KEVIN GREIF, on, behalf, of,
themselves, and, all, others, similarly, situated,
23
Plaintiff,
24
vs.
25
SANTANDER CONSUMER USA, INC.,
26
Defendant.
27

CASE NO. 2:18-cv-01647-WBS-EFB
CLASS ACTION
ORDER
Complaint Filed: June 6, 2018
Hon. William B. Shubb

28
CASE NO. 2:18-cv-01647-WBS-EFB
ORDER

1

Plaintiffs Vicki Blakely, Steven Lawson, Christy Mitchell, Leslie Williams, James

2 Rolland, Jaynellis Salinas, Kathleen Jones, Annie Bluitt, Samuel Carter, and Kevin Grief
3 (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Santander Consumer USA, Inc. (“SC”), by and through their
4 respective undersigned counsel of record, field a joint stipulation to stay this case pending appeal.
5 Good cause therefor appearing, the Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiffs and SC’s Joint Stipulation
6 to Stay Case Pending Appeal:
7

1.

This case is stayed and all pending deadlines are vacated until resolution of

8 Plaintiffs’ pending appeal in the April Lindblom v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc., Case No. 1:159 cv-00990-BAM,, defined here as: (1) Plaintiffs’ pending appeal to the Ninth Circuit of the
10 Lindblom court’s order denying motions to intervene in that case (Lindblom, Dkt. 153); (2)
11 Plaintiffs’ request for interlocutory appeal of the Lindblom court’s orders (Lindblom, Dkt. 152);
12 and (3) Plaintiffs’ request to the Lindblom court to certify a question for appeal (the “Appeal”);
13

2.

Within 5 court days after final resolution of Plaintiffs’ Appeal, Plaintiffs agree to

14 file a notice of ruling notifying this Court of the disposition of the Appeal and the parties may,
15 singularly or jointly, file a request to set a scheduling conference in this action.
16

3.

WHEREAS, the parties agree that SC’s response to Plaintiffs’ Complaint shall not

17 be due until at least thirty days after the filing of a notice of ruling on Plaintiffs’ Appeal, except as
18 otherwise ordered by the Court or stipulated to by the parties.
19
20 IT IS SO ORDERED.
21 Dated: July 26, 2018
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO. 2:18-cv-01647-WBS-EFB