Blakely et al v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc.

Filing 54

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 4/22/2020 DISMISSING with prejudice claims of Plaintiff Samuel Carter and James Rolland. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2
3

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SACRAMENTO DIVISION

4
5
6
7
8

VICKI BLAKELY, STEVEN LAWSON,
CHRISTY MITCHELL, LESLIE
WILLIAMS, JAMES ROLLAND,
JAYNELLIS SALINAS, KATHLEEN
JONES, ANNIE BLUITT, SAMUEL
CARTER, & KEVIN GREIF, on, behalf, of,
themselves, and, all, others, similarly, situated,
Plaintiff,

9
10
11
12

vs.
SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.,
Defendant.

CASE NO. 2:18-cv-01647-WBS-EFB
CLASS ACTION
ORDER DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE
CLAIMS OF PLAINTIFF SAMUEL
CARTER AND JAMES ROLLAND
Complaint Filed: June 6, 2018
Answer Filed: November 18, 2019
Hon. William B. Shubb

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

This matter is before the Court on the joint stipulation of Plaintiffs, Samuel Carter and
James Rolland, and Defendant Santander Consumer USA Inc. (“SC”) to dismiss with prejudice
Plaintiff Samuel Carter’s and Plaintiff James Rolland’s individual claims against SC and to
dismiss any claims that Samuel Carter and James Rolland asserts on behalf of absent putative
class members without prejudice. Having considered the Parties’ Stipulation of Dismissal with
Prejudice, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby orders as follows:
1. Plaintiff Samuel Carter’s individual claims against SC are dismissed with prejudice.
2. Plaintiff James Rolland’s individual claims against SC are dismissed with prejudice.
3. Any claims that Samuel Carter and James Rolland asserts on behalf of absent putative
class members in this action are dismissed without prejudice.
4. Each party will bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs associated with this case.

25
26
27
28
CASE NO. 2:18-cv-01647-WBS-EFB

ORDER

1

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 22, 2020

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO. 2:18-cv-01647-WBS-EFB

ORDER