Estate of Tyler S. Rushing et al v. AG Private Protection, Inc. et al
Filing
44
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 12/3/19 GRANTING Request for page limit increase. Plaintiffs' opposition brief shall receive a ten (10) page limit increase, in addition to the regularly-afforded twenty (20) pages, for a total of thirty (30) pages. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
11
Case No. 2:18-cv-01692-MCE-AC
ESTATE OF TYLER S. RUSHING, et al.,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
vs.
14
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’
REQUEST FOR PAGE LIMIT INCREASE
RE: OPPOSITION TO CITY DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
AG PRIVATE PROTECTION, INC., et al.,
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Defendants.
GOOD CAUSE appearing, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs Estate of Tyler S. Rushing, Scott K.
Rushing, and Paula L. Rushing’s request for page limit increase concerning their forthcoming opposition
to Defendants City of Chico, Chico Police Department, Scott Ruppel, Cedric Schwyzer, Alex Fliehr, and
Jeremy Gagnebin’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 37). Plaintiffs’ opposition brief shall
receive a ten (10) page limit increase, in addition to the regularly-afforded twenty (20) pages, for a total
of thirty (30) pages.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 3, 2019
24
25
26
27
28
30
31
1
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR PAGE LIMIT INCREASE RE: OPPOSITION TO CITY DEFENDANTS’ MSJ
Estate of Rushing v. AG Private Protection, Inc., United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 2:18-cv-01692-MCE-AC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?