Estate of Tyler S. Rushing et al v. AG Private Protection, Inc. et al

Filing 44

ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 12/3/19 GRANTING Request for page limit increase. Plaintiffs' opposition brief shall receive a ten (10) page limit increase, in addition to the regularly-afforded twenty (20) pages, for a total of thirty (30) pages. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 11 Case No. 2:18-cv-01692-MCE-AC ESTATE OF TYLER S. RUSHING, et al., 12 Plaintiffs, 13 vs. 14 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR PAGE LIMIT INCREASE RE: OPPOSITION TO CITY DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AG PRIVATE PROTECTION, INC., et al., 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Defendants. GOOD CAUSE appearing, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs Estate of Tyler S. Rushing, Scott K. Rushing, and Paula L. Rushing’s request for page limit increase concerning their forthcoming opposition to Defendants City of Chico, Chico Police Department, Scott Ruppel, Cedric Schwyzer, Alex Fliehr, and Jeremy Gagnebin’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 37). Plaintiffs’ opposition brief shall receive a ten (10) page limit increase, in addition to the regularly-afforded twenty (20) pages, for a total of thirty (30) pages. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 3, 2019 24 25 26 27 28 30 31 1 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR PAGE LIMIT INCREASE RE: OPPOSITION TO CITY DEFENDANTS’ MSJ Estate of Rushing v. AG Private Protection, Inc., United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 2:18-cv-01692-MCE-AC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?