Estate of Tyler S. Rushing et al v. AG Private Protection, Inc. et al

Filing 51

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/11/2019 GRANTING 47 Request for a page limit increase concerning their Reply to be filed in support of their Motion for Summary Judgment Or, In the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment. The Chico Defendants' Reply brief shall receive a ten (10)-page limit increase, in addition to the regularly-afforded ten (10) pages, for a total of twenty (20) pages. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ESTATE OF TYLER S. RUSHING, ) U.S.D.C. Case: 2:18-cv-01692-MCE-AC SCOTT K. RUSHING, and PAULA ) L. RUSHING, ) Assigned to the Honorable District Court ) Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. ) Plaintiffs, ) ORDER GRANTING CHICO vs. ) DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR AG PRIVATE PROTECTION, INC., ) PAGE LIMIT INCREASE RE: ) REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION EDGAR SANCHEZ, CITY OF ) FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CHICO, CHICO POLICE DEPARTMENT, SCOTT RUPPEL, ) ) CEDRIC SCHWYZER, ALEX ) FLIEHR, JEREMY GAGNEBIN, ) COUNTY OF BUTTE, BUTTE ) COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, IAN DICKERSON, and DOE 1-20, ) Action Filed: June 8, 2018 ) ) Defendants. ) 25 26 GOOD CAUSE appearing, the Court GRANTS Defendants City of Chico, 27 Chico Police Department, Scott Ruppel, Cedric Schwyzer, Alex Fliehr, and 28 Jeremy Gagnebin’s (the “Chico Defendants”) request for a page limit increase 1 1 concerning their Reply to be filed in support of their Motion for Summary 2 Judgment Or, In the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 37). The 3 Chico Defendants’ Reply brief shall receive a ten (10)-page limit increase, in 4 addition to the regularly-afforded ten (10) pages, for a total of twenty (20) pages. 5 6 7 DATED: 12/11/2019 /s/ John A. Mendez__________________ For the Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?