Hanson v. Moore et al
Filing
14
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 9/13/2018 ADOPTING in FULL 11 Findings and Recommendations; DENYING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP; Plaintiff is DIRECTED to pay the $400 filing fee within 30 days of the date this order is served; and Plaintiff is admonished that failure to comply will result in the dismissal of this action. (Washington, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
BARON KEITH JOHNNY HANSON, Jr.,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:18-cv-1720-MCE-EFB P
v.
ORDER
TOMMIE BOORE, Jr., et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a civil detainee proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On July 20, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which
20
21
were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings
22
and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to
23
the findings and recommendations.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
24
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed July 20, 2018, (ECF No. 11) are ADOPTED
27
28
in full;
1
1
2. Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is DENIED;
2
3. Plaintiff is directed to pay the $400 filing fee within 30 days of the date this order is
3
served; and
4
5
6
7
4. Plaintiff is admonished that failure to comply will result in the dismissal of this
action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 13, 2018
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?