Yegorov v. Japan

Filing 4

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 07/11/18 RECOMMENDING that this his action be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Benson, A.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DMITRIY YEGOROV,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:18-cv-01731 KJM CKD (PS)

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

JAPAN,
Defendant.

16
17
18
19

Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The matter was referred to a United States
Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c).
On June 19, 2018 the undersigned issued an order to show cause no later than July 6, 2018

20

why this action should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Plaintiff was advised that failure

21

to allege a proper basis for jurisdiction would result in a recommendation that this action be

22

dismissed. The deadline has passed, and plaintiff has not responded to the order to show cause.

23
24
25

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for lack of
jurisdiction.
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

26

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

27

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

28
1

1

with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

2

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that

3

failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District

4
Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
5
6

Dated: July 11, 2018

7
8
9
10
11

2/ yegorov1731.osc_f&rs

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2