Sokolik v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 14

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/24/2019 EXTENDING defendant's time for responding to plaintiff's motion for summary judgment to 2/22/2019. (Zignago, K.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

MCGREGOR W. SCOTT
United States Attorney
DEBORAH LEE STACHEL
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
BEATRICE NA, CSBN 303390
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Social Security Administration
Office of the General Counsel
160 Spear St Ste 800
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

13
14
15

Plaintiff,

16
17
18

) Case No. 2:18-cv-01737-EFB
)
) JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED
) ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CYNTHIA A. SOKOLIK,

vs.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

19
20

Defendant.

21
22

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective

23

counsel of record, that Defendant’s time for responding to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary

24

Judgment be extended from January 22, 2019 to February 22, 2019. This is Defendant’s first

25

request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment.

26

Defendant requests this extension due to her counsel’s heavy workload. Defendant’s

27

counsel is currently responsible for two Social Security appellate cases before the United States

28

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in addition to nine cases that require imminent briefing in

Joint Stip. & Prop. Order for Ext.; 2:18-cv-01737-EFB

1

1

the United States District Courts for the Eastern District, Northern District, and Southern District

2

of California, and District of Nevada.

3

Defendant’s counsel respectfully requests this additional time to expend the necessary

4

time to review the 1,969-page record and to evaluate the issues Plaintiff raised, and to submit

5

Defendant’s response for review by this Court.

6
7
8

The parties further stipulate that all subsequent deadlines set forth in the Court’s
Scheduling Order shall be extended accordingly.
The parties stipulate in good faith, with no intent to prolong proceedings unduly.

9

Respectfully submitted,

10
Dated: January 22, 2019

/s/ Beatrice Na for Shellie Lott *
(* As authorized via email on January 20, 2019)
SHELLIE LOTT

11
12

Attorney for Plaintiff

13
14
15

Dated: January 22, 2019

MCGREGOR W. SCOTT
United States Attorney

16
By:

17
18

/s/ Beatrice Na
BEATRICE NA
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant

19
20

ORDER

21
22
23

APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 24, 2019

24
25

__________________________________
THE HONORABLE EDMUND F. BRENNAN
United States Magistrate Judge

26
27
28

Joint Stip. & Prop. Order for Ext.; 2:18-cv-01737-EFB

2