Gomez v. Unknown
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 11/5/2018 ORDERING that within 30 days of the entry of this order petitioner shall SHOW CAUSE why this matter should not be dismissed. Petitioner is warned that a failure to respond to this order timely shall result in an immediate recommendation that the district court enter an order dismissing the petition with prejudice. (Huang, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ALFREDO GOMEZ,
12
13
14
Petitioner,
No. 2:18-cv-1738
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
v.
UNKNOWN,
15
Respondent.
16
17
18
Petitioner filed motion for stay and abeyance on June 15, 2018. ECF No. 1. On July 16,
19
2018 this court issued an order that denied the motion and informed petitioner that a petition for
20
habeas corpus must be filed before a request for stay and abeyance can be addressed, and
21
provided him with this court’s form to assist him in preparing a petition for writ together with a
22
copy of the court’s in forma pauperis application form which he must file if he wishes to avoid
23
paying the filing fee required by the court. To date, now more than 3 months after the order was
24
issued, petitioner has failed to take any action.
25
In light of the foregoing IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
26
1.
Within thirty (30) days of the entry of this order petitioner shall show cause why
27
this matter should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and/or to follow a court order pursuant
28
to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
1
1
2.
Petitioner is warned that a failure to respond to this order timely shall result in an
2
immediate recommendation that the district court enter an order dismissing the petition with
3
prejudice for failure to prosecute and/or to obey an order of the court.
4
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November, 5, 2018
/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?